Go back to2005
21 years laterFileCabi is back..Read the story →

The Forum › Everything Else FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)

Are there Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq?

Salvaged from archive These posts were salvaged from the web archive of the original FileCabi forum (2007–2008). Usernames are as they were then and aren’t linked to today’s accounts.
  1. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 19:19
    Let's see how many are disillusioned.
  2. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 20:10
    Evil! What have I told you? What have I told you? Actually... nothing but play nice with others. You seem actually quite happy that we have found harmful weapons in the Middle East like you wanted those people to go over there and get killed to find those weapons. I dunno I heard the kind of weapons aren't really that bad or somthing.
  3. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 21:35
    Evil! What have I told you? What have I told you? Actually... nothing but play nice with others. You seem actually quite happy that we have found harmful weapons in the Middle East like you wanted those people to go over there and get killed to find those weapons. I dunno I heard the kind of weapons aren't really that bad or somthing. Saddam killed thousands of Kurds with those same weapons.
  4. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:12
    What are they? I have been busy all day. Didn't watch the news.
  5. andrexoteSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:45
    maybe the same weapons that US gived him years before to kill iranian troops....... OH NO HERE COMES THE 20 LINES OF BULLSHIT AGAIN! :x :x :( :x :x
  6. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:47
    What are they? I have been busy all day. Didn't watch the news. A various assortment of Mustard and Sarin Nerve gas shells.
  7. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:48
    maybe the same weapons that US gived him years before to kill iranian troops....... OH NO HERE COMES THE 20 LINES OF BULLSHIT AGAIN! :x :x :( :x :x The only bullshit I see is coming out of your mouth. We didn't give them or sell them our chemical weapons.
  8. andrexoteSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:56
    OOOHH!!....ohh that wasnt that bad..., hey but u start the problem now finish it. not chemical weapons....thats true..not chemical i guess that saddam made so much money with oil that he payed for its own chemical weapons...if he ever had chemical weapons...something i dont know til i talk with my bro :lol: :lol:
  9. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 22:59
    OOOHH!!....ohh that wasnt that bad..., hey but u start the problem now finish it. not chemical weapons....thats true..not chemical i guess that saddam made so much money with oil that he payed for its own chemical weapons...if he ever had chemical weapons...something i dont know til i talk with my bro :lol: :lol: What the Hell are you talking about? The entire WORLD knew Saddam had chemical weapons and we have been finding them for the last three years according to the recently released report.
  10. andrexoteSalvaged from archive22 Jun 2006, 23:10
    hmm...it all begins on the year 900ac. i think... fuck, cant write on english.....dont take it personally evil, i dont hate you, i hate your goverment of the last 300 years, thats all ;) lemme organize to fill you up with liberal bullshit one of these days, then u can bring me the conservative bullshit and debate like every other forum does...so what? we wont change our minds...or the world, we will be living the same life with the same history... i dont know what type of history u learn at school as a child but i learn how not listen just one side of the history. i realized that more i know of my country, more angry people get with england, spain, chile, usa.... allways behind of some reason, they all want 2 things, money and energy......i hate to be an steretype of "LIBERAL ANGRY YOUNG BOY", you cant express how you would like to cause they bring the "oh you are liberal" shit again...omg i got lost
  11. Commando80Salvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 00:19
    Man, i doubt they have WMDs.... they fucking live in mud houses and caves practically.. you think they are capable of creating a high tech nuclear bomb or a chemical bomb? Anthrax exluded of course, they send that through the mail. But until they are smart, well.. im just not afriad of any iraqis sending nukes to us. (not yet anyway)
  12. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 00:23
    i hate to be an steretype of "LIBERAL ANGRY YOUNG BOY", you cant express how you would like to cause they bring the "oh you are liberal" shit again...omg i got lost Well you certainly lost me.
  13. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 00:32
    Man, i doubt they have WMDs.... they fucking live in mud houses and caves practically.. you think they are capable of creating a high tech nuclear bomb or a chemical bomb? Anthrax exluded of course, they send that through the mail. But until they are smart, well.. im just not afriad of any iraqis sending nukes to us. (not yet anyway) WMD's are not all nukes. They have chemical WMD's. We have been finding them apparently the last 3 years according to the recently released intel report.
  14. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 01:40
    Can we see these reports. The one's that I have seen say no WMD's have been found.
  15. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 01:46
    Can we see these reports. The one's that I have seen say no WMD's have been found. Yes look in General chat were I posted a url and others posted some..which were biased.
  16. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 01:48
    k, gunna check it out guess there are. Declassified intel report states it.
  17. tgd_02Salvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 09:57
    uh.....fuck it
  18. hiSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 10:07
    Can we see these reports. The one's that I have seen say no WMD's have been found. Yes look in General chat were I posted a url and others posted some..which were biased. Like Fox news. :D
  19. Snuff.Salvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 11:16
    Evil Con: you do realise how intellectually retarded it makes you look to dismiss everything other than your mid-west (-stab in the dark-) sources and Fox news as "liberal bullshit". Dude, I like you in many ways; but it literally PAINS me to see a pretty smart geezer so blatantly disenfranchised by his society. You are not looking. You are not thinking. You are crusading. :(
  20. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 14:20
    Evil Con: you do realise how intellectually retarded it makes you look to dismiss everything other than your mid-west (-stab in the dark-) sources and Fox news as "liberal bullshit". Dude, I like you in many ways; but it literally PAINS me to see a pretty smart geezer so blatantly disenfranchised by his society. You are not looking. You are not thinking. You are crusading. :( No I don't...because well..it's the truth. You live in Britain. Here the media(cable news..newspapers..etc.) are liberal biased. It is completely obvious to the neutral observer...or non neutral that Fox news is about the only cable news that is realatively unbiased/conservative. I'm not a geezer yet lol. 3 decades +1 isn't a geezer. :shock: :lol:
  21. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive23 Jun 2006, 16:02
    What's a "GEEZER"? You young whipper snappers!
  22. FarelliSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 03:21
    forgive me if im wrong but didnt Saddam say he had them? And if thats true i dont blame Bush for what he did. Even so he should have approached the situation differently.
  23. Snuff.Salvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 06:01
    forgive me if im wrong but didnt Saddam say he had them? And if thats true i dont blame Bush for what he did. Even so he should have approached the situation differently. Thank you for bumping this thread! Damn, I actually miss Evil some days. Let me give ya the lowdown: Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons, to be used on infantry, stored since the Iran-Iraq war, in many cases bought from Western countries. Before invading Iraq we were told he had these weapons as a pretext for its invasion. We laughed. And when we did laugh they fabricated the claims to say something along the lines of "Saddam Hussein could level a WMD at the West in 45 minutes". At this point, while the majority remained laughing, some became paranoid and agitated and the Bush allegiance bent 'em over and puckered their arseholes for a buggering. And buggered they were. Three years down the line the Bush administration decided to release its files regarding Sarin and mustard-variant gas shells found in Iraq since the invasion. The problem is that Sarin gas is massively unstable, and left-overs from over two decades ago just weren't ever going to cut the mustard. We at the very least needed conclusive proof that Iraq was manufacturing more or had ones which we DID NOT KNOW about...of which there was and still is none to be found. Fox news, as far as I'm aware, were the ONLY station to report the findings (besides a side-collumn at the back of the "international news" section"), and when Evil saw the report he came running here, eyes ablaze and heels a-clicking, and we LAUGHED him off the boards. It was a momentous occasion at filecabi.net.
  24. FarelliSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 17:35
    maybe fox should just stick with airing the simpsons and leave politics alone.
  25. FrostSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 18:02
    What was he banned for? If you don't mind me asking...
  26. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 18:05
    What was he banned for? If you don't mind me asking... Being Stupid!
  27. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 18:12
    What was he banned for? If you don't mind me asking... It was all a blur for me. He posted a cartoon of an Arabian man with a bomb in his turban then he had a big hissy fit and then he made 23+ accounts and then he got banned with all the accounts he created.
  28. FrostSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 18:15
    Well I'll try not to cry over missing out on such a "charming" personality.
  29. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 18:35
    Well I'll try not to cry over missing out on such a "charming" personality. Hey no need to.
  30. tgd_02Salvaged from archive15 Oct 2006, 23:12
    What was he banned for? If you don't mind me asking... man that night he was banned was the shit that dude went all out on the self righteous including his dumbass self
  31. FrostSalvaged from archive16 Oct 2006, 17:33
    kinda wish I was there to see it
  32. barleySalvaged from archive17 Oct 2006, 09:15
    pointless topic,like anyone here would really know the answer? just because they have not been found doesnt say they were not or are not stil there
  33. Snuff.Salvaged from archive17 Oct 2006, 14:36
    pointless topic,like anyone here would really know the answer? just because they have not been found doesnt say they were not or are not stil there Do some research and update your analogy. WMDs have been found -- intel released by the Bush administration clarifies this...unfortunately they're competely fucking useless. End of story.
  34. henriqueSalvaged from archive20 Nov 2006, 20:09
    isso foi uma falta d emprego d tecnicas policiais, mal profissional o gringo
  35. Clouds in the SkySalvaged from archive20 Nov 2006, 21:20
    I have weapons of mass destruction...Their names are Candy and Gilda! yeah, lame.
  36. Clouds in the SkySalvaged from archive20 Nov 2006, 21:30
    Well Gilda's gone to the Bahamas for a week or two so, you only have Candy to handle.
  37. Clouds in the SkySalvaged from archive20 Nov 2006, 21:35
    lol, what's with me and going off topic everywhere lately?
  38. HuntSalvaged from archive20 Nov 2006, 22:49
    It's easy to go off-topic when the topic is pointless.

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.