Go back to2005
21 years laterFileCabi is back..Read the story →

The Forum › Everything Else FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)

Political/Politics Forum

Salvaged from archive These posts were salvaged from the web archive of the original FileCabi forum (2007–2008). Usernames are as they were then and aren’t linked to today’s accounts.
  1. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive15 Aug 2006, 21:57
    *ahem* It strikes me that it would be nice to have a Political Forum on the boards. Many if not most boards I have frequented in the past have a Political Forum, so why not Filecabinet? It would unclutter the General Chat with the perpetually inflammatory topics that most of the younger members care little about anyway in my opinion. Even so if they wish they could still go to the Political Forum to voice their young opinions. :) It would have to be Fair & Balanced...http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon-dark.gi… it should be in all forums and be moderated heavily to keep the inevitable personal flames about people that post their opinions and debate. Flaming another's opinion(s) I suppose would be tolerable if that is the wish just not personal attacks about someone for having them. I'd happily moderate it fairly and unbiased if one of our three regular general moderators aren't up to it. http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon-two-gun… :wink: :lol: :twisted: At any rate I think these forums need a Political Forum. What say you?
  2. longbobSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 00:27
    Do it, please. I can't generally be arsed to read through the political threads so yes is my vote. Longbob.
  3. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 00:44
    We use to have a political forum. But it was removed, we could use it again. Why was it removed? :?
  4. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 00:45
    Yes, so long as flamewars go into the correct threads(FIGHTROOM).
  5. longbobSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 02:09
    Yes, so long as flamewars go into the correct threads(FIGHTROOM). I think your onto a loser there Joe. It seems the majority of threads on filecabi.net turn inflammatory at some point. Understandable really given the nature of the site in the first place which dictates the general audience on the forums. For anyone wanting genuine highbrow political debate I suggest finding the appropriate forums. Primarily though filecabi.net is a fantastic entertaining video site with the perfect balance of madness that knows (99% of the time - see the church of fudge :wink: ) the limits that can be stretched. Longbob.
  6. Commando80Salvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 10:31
    Political forums will probably turn into flame wars.. mabye there should be a mini fight room thread ( a sticky) In there! :twisted:
  7. MerrillizerSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 11:35
    Most Political forums are used by the self-righteous to grandstand. We are not really into catering to those who believe there way is the "only way". If you want to have political debates, there are plenty of message boards that can be found on the internet that are for that specific purpose. Political forums and debates always turn sour. Nobody wants to hear it. This board is not meant to represent any one view by some majority.
  8. cheese muffinSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 12:37
    Remember there are two things never to talk about in a group. Politics and Religion. thats because these subjects are usually the root of flamewars.
  9. MonstermashSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 15:15
    I voted yes. Although I bet you some of the youngsters will go there to take the piss. But I like this forum and some of the madness they bring to the site. I'd hate this place to get too serious!
  10. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 18:10
    Most Political forums are used by the self-righteous to grandstand. We are not really into catering to those who believe there way is the "only way". If you want to have political debates, there are plenty of message boards that can be found on the internet that are for that specific purpose. Political forums and debates always turn sour. Nobody wants to hear it. This board is not meant to represent any one view by some majority. Yes yes..of course you are welcome to your opinion. The fact remains though that political threads will continually be posted in General Chat if you do not allow for a Political Forum.
  11. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 19:02
    Most Political forums are used by the self-righteous to grandstand. We are not really into catering to those who believe there way is the "only way". If you want to have political debates, there are plenty of message boards that can be found on the internet that are for that specific purpose. Political forums and debates always turn sour. Nobody wants to hear it. This board is not meant to represent any one view by some majority. Yes yes..of course you are welcome to your opinion. The fact remains though that political threads will continually be posted in General Chat if you do not allow for a Political Forum. Yes yes.....of course we have our opinions. The fact remains EC that no matter how much that you ask and whine about it, it does not appear that there will be a "Political Forum" or a "Religious Forum" in the Falicabi.net! You may continue (as may anyone else) to post or comment on topics of your choice in the "General Chat Forum" Regardless that it be a political or religious thread. These threads can be a productive form of banter and can be a means of making political allies as well as enemies.....depending on how the posts in the forums are conducted. These will continue to go on as they have for a long time, monitored by the staff. If one gets "Out of Control" or "Off Topic" it can be dealt with with minor casualities. If they get really bad, they will be shut down and locked. Simple Rules for these types of Forums..... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Avoid Repetition
  12. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 19:55
    Yes yes.....of course we have our opinions. The fact remains EC that no matter how much that you ask and whine about it, it does not appear that there will be a "Political Forum" or a "Religious Forum" in the Falicabi.net! You may continue (as may anyone else) to post or comment on topics of your choice in the "General Chat Forum" Regardless that it be a political or religious thread. These threads can be a productive form of banter and can be a means of making political allies as well as enemies.....depending on how the posts in the forums are conducted. These will continue to go on as they have for a long time, monitored by the staff. If one gets "Out of Control" or "Off Topic" it can be dealt with with minor casualities. If they get really bad, they will be shut down and locked. Simple Rules for these types of Forums..... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Avoid Repetition[ Pfft..this is a valid and thoughtful suggestion that would unclutter the precious general chat. I wasn't whinning at all. It had just occured to me that this forum had no political forum all at once and I posted my suggestion. Do not down my valid opinion by calling it whinning. Almost all boards over my years of browsing the internet have had a forum for people that want to talk about politics. It's simple..easy. A pirate forum was made, but the idea of a political forum to unclutter things angers you and Merrill? I am speachless...well almost. http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon_dark_ev…
  13. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 20:53
    ANGER ME? Did I sound like I was MAD? NAY, say I ....for you do not know what it is like to anger me! When I get mad, I YELL LIKE THIS!
  14. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 21:17
    ANGER ME? Did I sound like I was MAD? NAY, say I ....for you do not know what it is like to anger me! When I get mad, I YELL LIKE THIS! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!... :lol:
  15. AllisterFiendSalvaged from archive16 Aug 2006, 21:23
    I think we need to get rid of the pirate forum and make a Political Forum. I vote yes.
  16. MerrillizerSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 01:53
    Yes yes.....of course we have our opinions. The fact remains EC that no matter how much that you ask and whine about it, it does not appear that there will be a "Political Forum" or a "Religious Forum" in the Falicabi.net! You may continue (as may anyone else) to post or comment on topics of your choice in the "General Chat Forum" Regardless that it be a political or religious thread. These threads can be a productive form of banter and can be a means of making political allies as well as enemies.....depending on how the posts in the forums are conducted. These will continue to go on as they have for a long time, monitored by the staff. If one gets "Out of Control" or "Off Topic" it can be dealt with with minor casualities. If they get really bad, they will be shut down and locked. Simple Rules for these types of Forums..... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Keep them moving in a Forward Direction... Avoid Repetition[ Pfft..this is a valid and thoughtful suggestion that would unclutter the precious general chat. I wasn't whinning at all. It had just occured to me that this forum had no political forum all at once and I posted my suggestion. Do not down my valid opinion by calling it whinning. Almost all boards over my years of browsing the internet have had a forum for people that want to talk about politics. It's simple..easy. A pirate forum was made, but the idea of a political forum to unclutter things angers you and Merrill? I am speachless...well almost. http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon_dark_ev… It doesnt "anger" me. More assumption, falsehood, and rhetoric from the far Right. Unclutter your mind first. Spare us the fireworks, even if a Political Forum ever came back, it surely will not be Moderated by someone so biased and partisan.
  17. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 02:08
    It doesnt "anger" me. More assumption, falsehood, and rhetoric from the far Right. Unclutter your mind first. Spare us the fireworks, even if a Political Forum ever came back, it surely will not be Moderated by someone so biased and partisan. More assumption that I'm far Right.. :lol: even more assumption that I cannot remained unbiased as a moderator of such a forum...because I have ran and moderated several forums just fine..unbiased. I care not if you believe me or not. :wink: I also could care less about being a mod here...now. A political forum with a experienced moderator or regular mod that's not going to edit or delete posts playing God with people's opinions(excluding personal flames) is all that I suggested.
  18. Snuff.Salvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 07:12
    Who else gets the impression this is a ploy by EC to attain staff status? :lol: Also, if I were staff I'd consider it a tad disrespectful if not insulting to be reading through the suggestions only to find the thread morph into a job application before my eyes. :lol: The whole "if filecabi.net's current mods aint up to the job" was a little on the brazen side. I'd suggest this is where your perceived hostility on the parts of Ozzie and Merril may stem from. :wink: No disrespect intended, but I'm sure you can understand the PsOV expressed here. That having been said, I too would enjoy a political discussion forum. However, given the size of the memberbase and its current mean age/general interest in, *ahem* more refined taste, I feel that, for the moment at least, general chat can accommodate the politically minded just fine. :)
  19. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 15:01
    Who else gets the impression this is a ploy by EC to attain staff status? :lol: Also, if I were staff I'd consider it a tad disrespectful if not insulting to be reading through the suggestions only to find the thread morph into a job application before my eyes. :lol: The whole "if filecabi.net's current mods aint up to the job" was a little on the brazen side. I'd suggest this is where your perceived hostility on the parts of Ozzie and Merril may stem from. :wink: No disrespect intended, but I'm sure you can understand the PsOV expressed here. That having been said, I too would enjoy a political discussion forum. However, given the size of the memberbase and its current mean age/general interest in, *ahem* more refined taste, I feel that, for the moment at least, general chat can accommodate the politically minded just fine. :) Your about the only one. I was im jest about the moderator crap involving me for a Political Forum. Some didn't see it that way I noticed you are the second to state they saw it that way. The regular moderators could take just as good care about it remaining unbiased. Being a moderator would be more of a burden than something special as you seem to view it anyway. I've ran boards..and been webmaster for many sites. Have you? I admit I have volunteered my services twice in the past when the mods were short..and still are short IMO. I doubt that will ever happen however anyway because I'm sure I'm not well liked by any of them. No matter...it doesn't bother me. I'm not a kid with dellusions of grandeur. :wink:
  20. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 15:52
    Who else gets the impression this is a ploy by EC to attain staff status? :lol: Also, if I were staff I'd consider it a tad disrespectful if not insulting to be reading through the suggestions only to find the thread morph into a job application before my eyes. :lol: The whole "if filecabi.net's current mods aint up to the job" was a little on the brazen side. I'd suggest this is where your perceived hostility on the parts of Ozzie and Merril may stem from. :wink: No disrespect intended, but I'm sure you can understand the PsOV expressed here. That having been said, I too would enjoy a political discussion forum. However, given the size of the memberbase and its current mean age/general interest in, *ahem* more refined taste, I feel that, for the moment at least, general chat can accommodate the politically minded just fine. :) Actually, I get quite a chuckle out of EC's Napoleonic attempts at placing the crown on his own head! I do not take anything he has said personally. Even his attempts at telling me what my responsibilities are and would be as mod. I am sure that all of the Mods and Administration have read EC's posts and are having their own little laugh. Actually, I find him quite likable....except for his capabilities to become quite overbearing and domineering in his posting. His subtle attempts at getting his "foot in the door" have not gone unnoticed. He may be in denial, but I think that it curdles his stomach to think someone of his capability would be passed up for the position. Ah, Visions of Grandeur, a lovely vision it is when looking through Rose colored glasses! :roll:
  21. That DudeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 15:57
    It doesnt "anger" me. More assumption, falsehood, and rhetoric from the far Right. Unclutter your mind first. Spare us the fireworks, even if a Political Forum ever came back, it surely will not be Moderated by someone so biased and partisan. More assumption that I'm far Right.. :lol: even more assumption that I cannot remained unbiased as a moderator of such a forum...because I have ran and moderated several forums just fine..unbiased. I care not if you believe me or not. :wink: I also could care less about being a mod here...now. A political forum with a experienced moderator or regular mod that's not going to edit or delete posts playing God with people's opinions(excluding personal flames) is all that I suggested. Well, here's the thing, E.C. This goes for anybody and any forums; If you ask for a position of power, you're not fit for it. The people who say they are the least biased are often the people who are the most biased of them all. It's a fact of life, man. Everyone is biased about everything. Personally, I think the fight room is the natural place for a Political or Religious discussion, simply because nobody can ever discuss politics or religion without getting pissed off about something. As well, since the Fight Room is unmoderated, we don't need to worry about finding a perfect Centrist Agnostic to moderate it.
  22. MerrillizerSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 16:07
    It doesnt "anger" me. More assumption, falsehood, and rhetoric from the far Right. Unclutter your mind first. Spare us the fireworks, even if a Political Forum ever came back, it surely will not be Moderated by someone so biased and partisan. More assumption that I'm far Right.. :lol: even more assumption that I cannot remained unbiased as a moderator of such a forum...because I have ran and moderated several forums just fine..unbiased. I care not if you believe me or not. :wink: I also could care less about being a mod here...now. A political forum with a experienced moderator or regular mod that's not going to edit or delete posts playing God with people's opinions(excluding personal flames) is all that I suggested. Well, here's the thing, E.C. This goes for anybody and any forums; If you ask for a position of power, you're not fit for it. The people who say they are the least biased are often the people who are the most biased of them all. It's a fact of life, man. Everyone is biased about everything. Personally, I think the fight room is the natural place for a Political or Religious discussion, simply because nobody can ever discuss politics or religion without getting pissed off about something. As well, since the Fight Room is unmoderated, we don't need to worry about finding a perfect Centrist Agnostic to moderate it. [Insert CLAPPING icons here]http://www.hawaii.com/phpBB2/images/smiles/00009176.gifht… (well almost clapping....they sure are happy!)
  23. MonstermashSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 16:48
    Maybe the mods should give the evil one his way on this. How can you prove he would'nt be a good mod. Is it possible to make someone a moderator in only certain forums. Just wondering, if this was possible you could give him a trial period and if he proves how good he is, maybe he could even become a proper mod. EC does say he's moderated before. Maybe you guys should give him a shot! Ambition isnt always a bad thing, It could be interesting to have a 'politics' forum.
  24. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 17:27
    Subtle attempts? I just said I "offered" to be one a good while back now. As to asking to be a moderator....Clouds in the Sky asked it in General Chat and the next day she was a moderator, so that whole notion of the asking or offering people not being qualified for the job that was just suggested is hypocritical. I don't care to be a Mod here because I think the only one I might halfway get along with in your little group is Ozzie since the rest of you take things so personally. You can consider that old offer of moderatorship rescinded Merrill. I wouldn't have it if you threw it in my face now after seeing the display here. :roll: http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon_vomit.gif
  25. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 17:37
    Maybe the mods should give the evil one his way on this. How can you prove he would'nt be a good mod. Is it possible to make someone a moderator in only certain forums. Just wondering, if this was possible you could give him a trial period and if he proves how good he is, maybe he could even become a proper mod. EC does say he's moderated before. Maybe you guys should give him a shot! Ambition isnt always a bad thing, It could be interesting to have a 'politics' forum. I wouldn't have it. I wouldn't accept it. I DO NOT WANT IT. I OFFERED my services..which would have taken free time from me. It was an offer because I had experience and they were short. That is all. The gods that be may take the pathetic moderatorship job...which is just that...a job.. that makes some think they are like higher schoolteachers policing the playground and shove it. :wink: Since this was turned into an issue I had to go all out..pfft. No I don't want moderatorship. I would like a Political Forum however which is what this topic/poll was originally about.
  26. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 17:41
    Personally, I think the fight room is the natural place for a Political or Religious discussion, simply because nobody can ever discuss politics or religion without getting pissed off about something. As well, since the Fight Room is unmoderated, we don't need to worry about finding a perfect Centrist Agnostic to moderate it. Removed the first part of your post in quote since I already answered it. You would have better luck trying to suck a golfball through a garden hose than try to argue real politics in an umoderated Fight Room forum. :roll: Amendment: Furthermore...moderating isn't that hard..you cut out the flames you warn people, you remind them to read the forum rules, and you do all this in an unbiased way and hold yourself to those same forum rules. That is all.
  27. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 17:46
    If you cut out the 2 moderator votes for No... am I assuming too much here? Then you have 12 to 4 for a Political forum at the moment....just to remind you what the POSTERS are wanting not just the Moderators.
  28. AllisterFiendSalvaged from archive17 Aug 2006, 18:20
    I think it would make everything a whole lot more organized... Maybe a political and religious forum. Wouldn't clutter everything up as much... :?
  29. Snuff.Salvaged from archive18 Aug 2006, 07:06
    Your about the only one. I was im jest about the moderator crap involving me for a Political Forum. Some didn't see it that way I noticed you are the second to state they saw it that way. The regular moderators could take just as good care about it remaining unbiased. Being a moderator would be more of a burden than something special as you seem to view it anyway. I've ran boards..and been webmaster for many sites. Have you? I admit I have volunteered my services twice in the past when the mods were short..and still are short IMO. I doubt that will ever happen however anyway because I'm sure I'm not well liked by any of them. No matter...it doesn't bother me. I'm not a kid with dellusions of grandeur. :wink: In which case I apologise to you, sir. I was merely suggesting that your attempt at humour may not have come across as subtlely(?) as you intended. :D As to That Dude's claims that "anybody who asks for a staff position is not fit to hold it", I disagree. Such a variable should contribute to an overall assessment regarding a person's characteristic fitness to take the position, but should not define it. Lastly, I would like to present to you the inherent fallaciousness of presenting a member with the U/N "Evil Conservative" the position to moderate a political forum from a nonpartisan perspective. I am not debating Evil's ability to moderate a forum in an unbiased way, rather humouring myself with the paradox of the circumstances. :lol:
  30. QuackersSalvaged from archive18 Aug 2006, 07:40
    Does the place really need anymore moderators? Its hardly crashing down about us. I dont think EC would make a good mod at all, everyone can see right through him nowdays.
  31. MonstermashSalvaged from archive18 Aug 2006, 18:27
    Do you think he's truly evil? Be warned he may have the darkside of the force..... :shock: I would like to see a political forum though. Could be interesting guys. Maybe if you gave EC a chance he may very well prove you wrong and if he does'nt then you've proved yourselves right? What's there to lose? :idea:
  32. verticalkillerSalvaged from archive18 Aug 2006, 23:25
    Do you think he's truly evil? Be warned he may have the darkside of the force..... :shock: I would like to see a political forum though. Could be interesting guys. Maybe if you gave EC a chance he may very well prove you wrong and if he does'nt then you've proved yourselves right? What's there to lose? :idea: Nothing
  33. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 00:58
    I don't wish to be a moderator here. Period...enough already. Already said it...why must I repeat it. It's distracting from the real point of the thread.
  34. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 01:00
    Does the place really need anymore moderators? Its hardly crashing down about us. I dont think EC would make a good mod at all, everyone can see right through him nowdays. Take your flames back to the Fight Room where they belong since none will moderate your ass at the moment. http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon_fatal.gif
  35. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 02:06
    Does the place really need anymore moderators? Its hardly crashing down about us. I dont think EC would make a good mod at all, everyone can see right through him nowdays. Take your flames back to the Fight Room where they belong since none will moderate your ass at the moment. http://bellsouthpwp.net/p/o/pott2613/WTF/emoticon_fatal.gif :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: What a pathetic response to a personal opinion that hardly comes close to being qualified as a FLAME.....Why don't you use your intelligence to post something with some meat and body in it, instead of crying or complaining about how things should be or would be if you were a mod. What do YOU need, a personal mod that will walk hand in hand with YOU through the Forums so you can point out whomever YOU feel needs to be moderated? Personally, I get tired of reading childish gibberish in these forums.
  36. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 02:32
    What a pathetic response to a personal opinion that hardly comes close to being qualified as a FLAME.....Why don't you use your intelligence to post something with some meat and body in it, instead of crying or complaining about how things should be or would be if you were a mod. What do YOU need, a personal mod that will walk hand in hand with YOU through the Forums so you can point out whomever YOU feel needs to be moderated? Personally, I get tired of reading childish gibberish in these forums. I dont think EC would make a good mod at all, everyone can see right through him nowdays. Right...that's not inflammatory...riight. Your just angry because I posted a noted lack of interest in it from moderators. Why should I reply to ignorant "childish gibberish" like that with intelligence. Go to the Israeli thread for intelligent response by me... BEFORE I YELL AT YOU! :lol:
  37. MerrillizerSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 03:25
    Sorry EC, cant side with ya on this one. I cant see that as a flame, merely an opinion. We are not going to get into the business of Moderating peoples opinions.
  38. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 03:33
    Sorry EC, cant side with ya on this one. I cant see that as a flame, merely an opinion. We are not going to get into the business of Moderating peoples opinions. Ah well...I can have my opinion about people seeing him as a blinded fool then yes? If so all is well. :lol:
  39. QuackersSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 03:57
    http://www.arsenal4arab.com/forums/images/arsenal4arab/sm…
  40. MonstermashSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 15:45
    What's P.E.T.A mean? Gosh I think this place should come with a code book sometimes. :P
  41. MerrillizerSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 15:50
    What's P.E.T.A mean? Gosh I think this place should come with a code book sometimes. :P People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
  42. QuackersSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 16:45
    Its abreviated to PETA everywhere, and spoken as 'petar', not just on filecabi.
  43. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive19 Aug 2006, 18:00
    Its abreviated to PETA everywhere, and spoken as 'petar', not just on filecabi. I do believe that it is pronounced the way it is written....PEE-TA, I believe a"Petar"is a person who is a member of "PETA" Monstermash questioned: What's P.E.T.A mean? Gosh I think this place should come with a code book sometimes. Merrill is correct in hie definition. But what he did not tell you is that the organization PETA is a RADICAL ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUP. They actually resort to covert actions, including assaults, vandalism and sabotage to get their points across. They are like the radical right to life protesters who believe it is okay to Kill the Doctor or Parents to Save the Baby or Set Fire to Clinics. More info can be found at their home page http://www.peta.org/ or in the UK http://www.peta.org.uk/. FBI reports on PETA's clandestine activities at :http://www.animalscam.com/news.cfm?id=2986 as well as the WASHINGTON TIMES @ http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20050821-103902-4686r.htm They have pulled such stunts as attacking KFC for killing chickens to eat, allegedly set fire to processing and rendering plants, sunk fishing boats, etc, etc. GOOGLE "PETA" than GOOGLE "PETA-CRIMINAL ACTS".....more stuff there than you can shake a stick at!
  44. QuackersSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 01:15
    Its abreviated to PETA everywhere, and spoken as 'petar', not just on filecabi. I do believe that it is pronounced the way it is written....PEE-TA, I believe a"Petar"is a person who is a member of "PETA" How you pronouce it really depends where you come from. :P
  45. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 02:25
    What's P.E.T.A mean? Gosh I think this place should come with a code book sometimes. :P People Eat Tasty Animals :twisted:
  46. That DudeSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 02:54
    What's P.E.T.A mean? Gosh I think this place should come with a code book sometimes. :P People Eat Tasty Animals :twisted: "Pretty Evil Transsexual Assholes"
  47. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 10:32
    13 - 6 .....won't help though will it? Just because it first came from me? :lol:
  48. MonstermashSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 15:50
    Thanks for the P.E.T.A details. Much obliged.
  49. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive20 Aug 2006, 21:20
    Political forum. Political forum. Political forum. waaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh cry cry.
  50. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 02:55
    Vote some more people. :D
  51. Snuff.Salvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 13:57
    http://www.helpyourselfmusic.com/sitebuilder/images/tumbl…
  52. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 16:11
    13 - 6 .....won't help though will it? Just because it first came from me? :lol: Your doing GOOD, Evil! Now the poll is 13-7!!! Keep up the good work! :D :twisted: :D :twisted: :D
  53. tgd_02Salvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 20:42
    i dont agree with one... itll turn into a conservative vs liberal vs i dont give 2 fucks about this.... people uh yea bad idea flame-galore no one will want to listen to the other side i can already predict many a snuffy vs EC bashing hmmm yep no healthy debate, just one side debating their views and how they are correct me HUNGRY!
  54. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 20:50
    i dont agree with one... itll turn into a conservative vs liberal vs i dont give 2 fucks about this.... people uh yea bad idea flame-galore no one will want to listen to the other side i can already predict many a snuffy vs EC bashing hmmm yep no healthy debate, just one side debating their views and how they are correct me HUNGRY! It's just going to go on in general chat without one and I invision a political forum where you can post whatever views you have not just liberal or conservative. Baffles me why some are opposed to it..especially some of the staff...unless it's just because of personal dislike of me. :roll:
  55. tgd_02Salvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 20:58
    well homeboy even though u came in here and riled the boards up....i dont think its u....uh so i think the mods just dont want a board for users to bash others and their views with the excuse of...."this is my political view" ive seen ur arguments mangz and no offense and u never credit or mention the efforts made by the other side in debating u...youd be the one mostly on the boards and people will just flame...and flame... and face it man theres not that many mature users on this board...so it be hard to find and have a healthy discussion with the inevitable UR A FAG!, bullshit...yourself included uh yea EVERYBODY LOVES FRUIT SALAD!!!
  56. Evil ConservativeSalvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 21:14
    well homeboy even though u came in here and riled the boards up....i dont think its u....uh so i think the mods just dont want a board for users to bash others and their views with the excuse of...."this is my political view" ive seen ur arguments mangz and no offense and u never credit or mention the efforts made by the other side in debating u...youd be the one mostly on the boards and people will just flame...and flame... and face it man theres not that many mature users on this board...so it be hard to find and have a healthy discussion with the inevitable UR A FAG!, bullshit...yourself included uh yea EVERYBODY LOVES FRUIT SALAD!!! People just don't like in your face attitudes and opinions and facts that can't be avoided just sidestepped or ignored. I give credit where credit is due. Repeating agian now that a political forum would be no different than having a pathetic pirate forum. Many of the video's posted here induce political debate. How many videos produce a "pirate" debate. :roll: Board rules apply to all except in the Fight Room. It's this board's loss for not having one not my loss. Current popular opinion agrees with this according to the poll as well.
  57. tgd_02Salvaged from archive22 Aug 2006, 21:20
    yea, but everybody loves fruit salad....

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.