The Forum › The Fight Room FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)
Muslim Rapes
Salvaged from archive These posts were salvaged from the web archive of the original FileCabi forum (2007–2008). Usernames are as they were then and aren’t linked to today’s accounts.
- jabaSalvaged from archive30 Oct 2006, 00:00this is from a blog by Fyordman "Rape: Nothing to do with Islam? I got some comments, among others from Norwegian blogger Bjørn Stærk, to my posts about the Norwegian government covering up the number of rapes committed by immigrants. The Swedish government is probably even worse, but Sweden is in many ways collapsing. Although he agreed that the statistics should be published, he questioned whether these rapes have anything to do with Islam. It is true that mass rapes of "the enemy's women", in part to humiliate the enemy's men, is not unique to Islam. It has been done at times of war by the Vikings, the Mongols, the Germans and the Russians during WW2, and all the way up to the Balkans in the 1990s. That's also my point. The number of rapes committed by Muslim immigrants in Western nations are so extremely high that it is difficult to view them only as random acts of individuals. It resembles warfare. This happens in most Western European countries, as well as in other infidels countries such as India. In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that "thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks." In France, grotesque reports about systematic gang rapes of French or "too Western" Muslim girls keep coming in. At the same time, European jails are getting filled up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. You can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That's because they can't, or don't want to, see the obvious: This is exactly how an invading army would behave. Rape, pillage and bomb". http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/08...ith-islam.html I hope I dont come across as a racist but.....
- shawmuttSalvaged from archive30 Oct 2006, 00:00Isn't the internet grand? People can be completely unaccountable for their words and spout uncited garbage--oh wait, those blogs are cited! By other blogs! What a fucking joke. Why not just hang up posters? It does the same thing. Make it like this oldie but goody from Nazi Germany: http://home.comcast.net/~shawmutt/boycott.jpg Translation: Quote: German people's comrades! German housewives! You all know the disgraceful methods that so-called "German" Jews abroad are using to incite against the German people and Adolf Hitler's national government. If we do not want to give up and sink into deeper misery, we must defend ourselves. We therefore call on you to heed the appeal of our Führer, the German people's chancellor, for a boycott against the Jews and expect the full support of each person in this defensive action. Do not buy from Jewish shops! Do not go to a Jewish doctor! But maintain the strictest discipline. Do not even touch the hair on a Jew's head. The boycott begins Saturday morning at 10:00 a.m. From that moment on, we will watch to ensure that the boycott is strictly followed. He who tries to ignore the boycott will be seen as an enemy of the German people. On Saturday morning at 9:30 at the Lindenplatz and the Pflänzer there will be a large public Boycott Meeting Appear in masses and show that, in the hour of need, you stand with the German people. In Geisenheim, the following establishments will be boycotted: Georg Strauß, grain merchant, Marktstraße Gebr. Strauß, shop, Marktstraße Moritz Strauß, ironware, Marktstraße Hugo Forst, leather goods, Landstraße Dr. Nathan, physician, Landstraße Löwenthal, butcher, Pflänzer The local group office of the NSDAP
- jabaSalvaged from archive30 Oct 2006, 00:00Yes I suppose Fjordman could be Nazi for bringing it to our attention...if the stats are not correct of course. 68% of Danish and Norwegian rapes are perpetrated by non western immigrants. UK Channel 4 killing a documentary on Muslim Rape. Crime stats supressed by Sweden. Oh what the fuck! Its none of our business! http://www.bellagreetings.com/1/wfact3.gif
- jabaSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Oh dear oh dear oh dear! It is sad to assume that the blog I found has no basis in fact and that I should "grow up" and do my research. The whole point of the original blog was the increase in this sordid crime and the suppression of facts. I would like to point out that I have looked at this blog several times and followed it back to many sources. Australia, France, Sweden, Norway, Pakistan and many more countries all have news reports and media accounts relating to the rise these gang rapes yet it remains a taboo subject when it comes down to statistics directly linking muslims. I agree the fjordman blog was full of racist claptrap in the form of secondary posts but hey....whos fault is that? I need no Bible or Koran to tell me how to live my life nor do I need people telling me that I am a racist. What I would like is imput which isn't simply an excuse to display pseudo intellect. Come on fella's really! I notice that neither Ace or Shawmutt offer any factual information which dismiss the fjordman blog as complete bollocks. I think that Ace would rather polish his weapons of whatever destruction and that Shawmutt would rather stand on his UUA soapbox rather than accept this post as a genuine concern held by many. Talk about political correctness....Jesus H!
- SnuffSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00The implication of the blog relates that Muslims are more prone to rape due to some bizzare social complex augmented by their alienation from non-Muslims and indeed their cliqueing together and subsequently vewing women not of this clique as inferior, and thus bypassing any negative preconception relating to the abuse of these women, and furthermore that their stereotyped innate sexism is contributive of their "high rate of rape" -- which, we must remember, is not supported by statistics. :lol: Better than that even: the statistics have, of course, been suppressed. :lol: Lacking these statistics that are so vital to his underlying premise, Mr Fjordman turns to Oslo instead where 65% of rape cases are committed by those of a "non-Western European" background. Taking this statement on face value, which I'm as sure is a fatal error in my discourse as I'm sure the statement is flawed, those of "non-Western European" background comprise "only 14.3% of Oslo's population". I have no idea how Mr Fjordman would vindicate the adverb used in that statement, as 14.3% is a pretty vast proportion in terms of an immigrant population. Furthermore, immigrant populations, as he so kindly pointed, are statistically more prone to criminality. This is due to problems in habilitation. Lastly, the underlying precedent that "Muslims commit more rape" is founded in the hysteria surrounding their religion and related media frenzies about individual cases of rape by groups of Muslims. In other words: "bollocks". Mr Fjordman abuses his government's non-relinquishment of statistics that to all intents and purposes do not exist as a bargaining chip to further victimise Western followers of this creed. It is bullshit, plain and simple. Our liberal Northern European cousins have an unfortunate trend towards nationalism in their politics and media, and this noticeable manifests itself in indictments of immigrant populations. Carry on though, Jaba. I'm sure your ravings are heard by somebody upon the boards. Quote: Originally Posted by jabathut [b][u]68% of Danish and Norwegian rapes are perpetrated by muslim immigrants. No. 68% of the rapes in Oslo are committed by "non-Western immigrants".
- shawmuttSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Woah Ace, how did you quote him before he wrote his post? :| :wink: Quote: I notice that neither Ace or Shawmutt offer any factual information which dismiss the fjordman blog as complete bollocks. It's not my job to do the research lacking in the original assumption on this thread. Why should I waste my time responding, with facts and actual stats, to someone who is convinced in their hatred? They won't change their view no matter what stats or facts I posted. Therefore, I responded to his ill-conceived hatred with an equally ill-conceived hatred--no facts were necessary to prove my point.
- VanguardSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00bnd der ovr
- jabaSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Thanks to Snufftelect.... http://www.slycraft.com/surrender-1.jpg I shall go and dig.... http://extension.missouri.edu/explor...g06021hole.jpg as for Vanguard.... http://www.frettchenwelt.at/medikamente/vaseline.jpg
- SnuffSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Now I understand why you posted only a quotation in starting this thread...in person you talk a load of stark-raving gibberish. :? You diss a member who provided perfectly clear reasoning for why the treatment of women in many Islamic countries is cultural as opposed to religious as an "excuse to display psuedo-intellect", and put your tail between your legs and posted two pictures which VERY LOOSELY suggested my sound (though I say so myself) reasoning was equivocal of "surrendering" to "the Muslims". This last display has once and for all assured your fine self as another stiff-lipped member of the Countryside Alliance, clueless and withdrawn from the mainstream. Don't start a topic like this if you're not willing to engage in rational discourse. Thank you.
- jabaSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Wow snufftelect! I want some of what you are smoking! The first image is where I surrender to your superior intellect. The second is the hole I felt like digging to hide in after I read your post. The third image is of a substance which is often used to make things more comfortable during punishment (thanks Vanguard). Any other interpretations should be disregarded of course. As for being a member of the Countryside Allience......I go camping twice a year does that count?
- ColziSalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00Im sure fine words were said above. ie Ace. Rape is wrong in any Country as its still without the consent of another woman/person. Rapists should be dealt with in the correct manner.......... DEATH - thats the only way the pain and suffering of the victim will ease. Thats the right justice.
- Clouds In The SkySalvaged from archive31 Oct 2006, 00:00I've decided to create my own religion. Anybody want to join? I am the Lord Of The WORLD...You not following me condemns you to go pay Ed the armadillo tamer a little visit. He will greet you into his castle (which is located near Jupiter) and then rape you numerous times (he likes anal sex tremendously). After being disgraced in such a maner your soul gets thrown into a blender and then fed to mutant duck-billed platypus who will later on shit you into a black hole. If you do follow me, you will be allowed to eat all the corn chips you desire. It's your decision.
Reply
Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.
Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.