The Forum › Everything Else FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)

KKK on the rise again..

1. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 02:26
   http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20070209/ts_csm/akkk :mad2: extremly dislike the KKK. So wrapped up in their own racist bullshit. Worst part about em is that they raise their kids to be racist too.
2. loadrunnerSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 06:37
   http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/collections/1990/thumb… flash flood at the kkk convention
3. K-LabSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 07:00
   I hate the KKK with every once of my soul.Ther nothing but a big group of racist inbred sister fucking rednecks, and all of them should be drug out inot a street and horse whipped for hours.Make sure they have a slow and painful death.Cut there nuts off to so we don't have to worry about retards like that having kids.
4. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 07:01
   You simply MUST consider the source, Joe. While the article claims that Klan membership is now between 5,000-8,000 look at what it was 80 years ago...4,500,000!!! It also states that the Klan was at it's all time low during the '70s... Well, I graduated High School in the Early 70's and I know that the Klan was very active in Pennsylvania and surrounding states. I think that during this time, most of the activist concentrated on the Vietnam War, Watergate, Corruption in Government, Pollution and Nuclear Energy. Meanwhile, race relations were put on a back burner as people of color united together and all joined to fight a common cause. In order to get accurate figures in figuring out Klan Membership, you simply have to do it by percentages. Population in 2006......................................298,444, 215 per HERE (https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/print/us.html) ...........................5,000-8,000 Klan Membership (avg 6,500)=.0000217% of the population. Population in 1970...................................... 203,302,031 per HERE (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Census,_1970) ...........................2,000 members in mid '70's = .0000098% of the population. Population in 1930.......................................106,021 ,031 ............................4,5000,000 members in mid '20s= .04244% of the population. Now while the actual membership in the KKK may have increased since the '70's, the population has increased by 95,142,184 which would be a 47% increase in population. Whereas the Klan's membership increased by more than 100%...it was only .000026% of the population growth. No doubt that Klan activity is on the increase...but seeing it as being a secret society, I question both the US governments figures on membership. Just as much as I question what the Klan reports as many members are too chicken shit to go public and I am sure that the Klan would not be beyond "padding the figures" to make them seem stronger and more popular than they really are. You must agree that increase in Klan activity as well as the Arian Nation, Skinheads and other asocial groups as these is in direct correlation to the extreme increase in the numbers of illegal immigrants that are coming across our borders. If the Federal Government continues to drag its feet in controlling this ongoing problem, we can expect an even bigger increase in the membership and demonstration by such groups.
5. loadrunnerSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 07:07
   The think they are tough, nut why does someone wear a mask, when he has a point??? This is the most stupid of them. Playing hide and seek with a bunch of others. Is it becouce they are affraid they are going to be shot, when regonised? A: Yes they should be ! Should make a fake meeting, everyone is wearing a mask. and invite one of the real members. When someone says "And now we take of our masks" The real member sees he is the only white guy : lol
6. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 07:13
   http://edison.rutgers.edu/latimer/caution.jpg
7. DandruffBGoneSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 12:15
   You don't have to be around the KKK to witness racism....just hang out at Filecabi.net. Quote from "latest video" threads for instance: "your not telling the truth (but of course when does a jew ever tell the truth?) there was no significant drop in the jewish population from the time before ww2 and after. 6 million is a fuking joke. holohoax noone wants jews around because all they do is rip people off,hord money,lie,and start wars. the jewish people have been kicked out of every place they have occupied throughout history. dont you think there has to be a reason? jew are truly terrorists. and jews cry antisemitism more than apes cry racism. because everybody knows the only good jew is a victim and as far as the video goes,I would have spit all over him. what would he do?? fight? hahahahaha lmao@ a jew fighting"
8. andrexoteSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 13:13
   I'm glad with those numbers, Ozzie. But even in South American countries and Africa. There is racism. Here for example, back in the 40's many families took the European traditions and with them, racism. It's incredible. Many Club's doesn't let idian or black people to get in. There are no black or indians with high range in the army.People discriminate others if you have an indian lastname and stuff like that. There is one university that see this problem, cause even the goverment doesn't want to have something with this. As for me, as long they don't touch my family or friends, i'm ok.
9. tgd_02Salvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 14:00
   how saddening this country worsens by the day
10. jabaSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 14:18
    Racism exists in all cultures. When you look at what man does to fellow man look at Rwanda out of control. Every nationalist has a power agenda over others. If you look at the increase in Islamic extremism in Britain it is almost like a counter attack on racist attitudes in this country and mostly by younger folk on both sides.
11. Snuff.Salvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 16:24
    That bit in "Oh brother, where art thou?" sums it up for me: "Brothers! We are foregathered here to preserve our hallowed culture'n heritage! From intrusions, inclusions and dilutions! Of culluh! Of creed! Of our ol'-time religion! We aim to pull evil up by the root! Before it chokes out the flower of our culture'n heritage! And our women! Let's not forget those ladies, y'all, lookin' to us for p'tection! From darkies! From Jews! From Papists! And from all those smart-ass folk say we come descended from the monkeys! That's not my culture'n heritage! (...) And so...we gonna hang us a neegra!"
12. jabaSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 16:59
    That bit in "Oh brother, where art thou?" sums it up for me: "Brothers! We are foregathered here to preserve our hallowed culture'n heritage! From intrusions, inclusions and dilutions! Of culluh! Of creed! Of our ol'-time religion! We aim to pull evil up by the root! Before it chokes out the flower of our culture'n heritage! And our women! Let's not forget those ladies, y'all, lookin' to us for p'tection! From darkies! From Jews! From Papists! And from all those smart-ass folk say we come descended from the monkeys! That's not my culture'n heritage! (...) And so...we gonna hang us a neegra!" Good come back Snuff! Where derfux you been? Have you been working or in the treble time plus danger money plus bonus for Bernard Week? KEEP SPRAYING IT LAAADS!
13. petergriffinSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 17:26
    i dont have a problem with black people as most of you have come to believe. i just dont like what they do and how they act. for example. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/53/Lil-jon-and… i cant stand people like this. be it white or black or hispanic. i hate this to. http://media.urbandictionary.com/image/page/wigger-15513.jpg but i have absoutly no problem with just regular black people who... just act normal. pick up there kids from school and have a desk job. not dealing drugs and killing people. white people can be the exact same way. be it the former or the latter. i dont want to come across as racist. i simply stated that i dont like the kind of people that i showed above. white black brown or purple. :2twocents:
14. Snuff.Salvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 17:37
    Good come back Snuff! Where derfux you been? Have you been working or in the treble time plus danger money plus bonus for Bernard Week? KEEP SPRAYING IT LAAADS! Pretty much. Started working days last week. :rolleyes: Too knackered to do anything tonight - settled down with some mogadon, a beer and a few spliff. :rasta: Happy now. :)
15. jabaSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 17:46
    i dont have a problem with black people as most of but i have absoutly no problem with just regular black people who... just act normal i dont want to come across as racist. On behalf of Fatty dot com. please read your history Peter! I know you ain't a racist but you should work harder at school to totally understand why they get so angry about white men - OK?
16. hunsrusSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 20:52
    Yeah, KKK is a bad organization, but they're no different from the Black Panthers and NAACP. Both are black superiority organizations, but no one complains about them.:mad2:
17. petergriffinSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 21:23
    exactly. look at BET for example. if there was a WET white entertainment. it would be looked at as a white superiority channel. double standards everywhere.
18. AllisterFiendSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 21:56
    isn't the black panthers back, too?
19. tgd_02Salvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 22:56
    omfg BET IS ON TEH CAMPAIN FOR RACIAL DOMINANCE!!!!1ONE CONSPIRACIES!!!!!!!1111
20. DrazSalvaged from archive10 Feb 2007, 23:18
    I'm killing me a honkey ass KKK with a kater.
21. tgd_02Salvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 00:07
    i prefer the mara salvatrucha and latin kings sense of ID than these clowns in pointed hats, fuck them
22. tgd_02Salvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 00:17
    well latin kings aint a hate group and idk if they bothered with kkk white fucks always fucking hating everyone for some (no offense to the whites here) but wat can u do...at least i know my people wont be scared into running like the blacks were in the 50's... dont hate on that comment either...
23. Clouds in the SkySalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 00:29
    This dude has some serious eyebrows going on... http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d73/cloudzie/BNP_LyndaM…
24. QuackersSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:00
    Nazi's are hotter than the KKK
25. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:15
    Vikings are Hotter than Nazi's!
26. QuackersSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:21
    Fuck off they aint! Who else could pull off that moustache and hairdo better than Hitler?
27. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:38
    Fuck off they aint! Who else could pull off that moustache and hairdo better than Hitler? http://www.thebreeze.ca/images/Gallery/BushHitler-thumb.j… I say MORE?
28. QuackersSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:43
    Hitler was far more inteligent than Bush though.
29. FireballSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:48
    Hitler was far more inteligent than Bush though. Was he? WAS HE? You never know unless you play back the tapes and listen to what he says (if you speak German, of course) Anywho, how do you know that George Bush is not just some evil mastermind plotting and waiting until the moment when the whole world won't pay attention to him because he is so stupid, then he will reck havic on the WORLD MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
30. QuackersSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 15:51
    how do you know that George Bush is not just some evil mastermind Because he's from Texas.
31. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 16:37
    HITLER danced funny! http://my.opera.com/Chyren/homes/files/hitlerdance02.gif
32. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 16:50
    http://www.slowdays.org/files/pictures/hitler/hitler_ban_…
33. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 17:29
    http://dodashitler.ytmnd.com/
34. Snuff.Salvaged from archive11 Feb 2007, 18:25
    Yeah, KKK is a bad organization, but they're no different from the Black Panthers and NAACP. Both are black superiority organizations, but no one complains about them.:mad2: The difference is that black people are a minority in America, whereas white people are the majority - a majority which, to be fair, enslaved said minority and which to this day leads a proportionately less impoverished existence. I feel safe in saying that the majority of mainstream black-oriented organizations argue upon the premise that their race puts them at a social disadvantage - as do the NAACP - whereas an organization such as the KKK argues for white supremacy. It argues that white people are racially superior to darker people and, the KKK particular, that Christianity is the racial heritage of white people. I sense, however, that what you're trying to express is an anger at how "black has become a 'franchise'", which is essentially a social perception and not something you can prescribe responsibility for.
35. AllisterFiendSalvaged from archive12 Feb 2007, 21:24
    Y8IqkRbxcTA uhhh. I just liked this video... figured I would post it here. lol
36. FireballSalvaged from archive12 Feb 2007, 22:38
    http://americanhistory.si.edu/militaryhistory/img/graphic… Need I say more?
37. crazee horseSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 09:07
    Hitler was far more inteligent than Bush though. bush is as big a terrorist as bin laden, you forget that america funds the I.R.A. another thing, all the so called irish americans (well not all) saying that the english shouldnt be in ireland? dont make me laugh. in the war germany was fuelling up its submarines in southern ireland, and if it wasnt for Winston Churchill telling the irish to stop before the British kicked there asses too. just think if germany had took over ireland that could have possibly been a good enough base for the germans to use for an all out attatck on G.B. in which case you americans wouldnt have had anyone to have held your hands when you went into iraq. and before any one says that the americans helped in the war, yeah you may have a little but it did take you five fuckin years. rant over. who wants to be my friend? this is only my second post lol
38. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 10:03
    bush is as big a terrorist as bin laden, you forget that america funds the I.R.A. another thing, all the so called irish americans (well not all) saying that the english shouldnt be in ireland? dont make me laugh. in the war germany was fuelling up its submarines in southern ireland, and if it wasnt for Winston Churchill telling the irish to stop before the British kicked there asses too. just think if germany had took over ireland that could have possibly been a good enough base for the germans to use for an all out attatck on G.B. in which case you americans wouldnt have had anyone to have held your hands when you went into iraq. and before any one says that the americans helped in the war, yeah you may have a little but it did take you five fuckin years. rant over. who wants to be my friend? this is only my second post lol You're CRAZEE!
39. crazee horseSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 10:12
    thankyou. and i love cheese.
40. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 10:21
    thankyou. and i love cheese. Good! 'Cuz I jest CUT SOME!:eek: muahahahahahahahahaha:1orglaugh: :1orglaugh: :xyxthumbs:
41. crazee horseSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 10:25
    rofl, what country you in B.O.
42. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 10:47
    rofl, what country you in B.O. Eastern Pennsylvania, near the Delaware River, 40 miles north of Philadelphia... Near the East Coast of the good ol' USA !
43. crazee horseSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 11:57
    oh yeah, i know it lol
44. MonstermashSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 15:46
    I've enjoyed reading all the comments above. The KKK are a bunch of self deluded idiots. The sad thing is that a racist makes their children racist and it goes on like a vicious circle. You can only try to educate and where possible try to discourage groups like the KKK. If people want to be ignorant there's not much you can do about it, only try to discredit it with the truth.
45. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 16:16
    I wonder to myself..... which is worse.... KKK or the Illinois Nazi's.... KKK... The nazis are fun to heckle when I visit home.... Fuckin' IL Nazi's......
46. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive18 Feb 2007, 22:53
    I wonder to myself..... which is worse.... KKK or the Illinois Nazi's.... KKK... The nazis are fun to heckle when I visit home.... Fuckin' IL Nazi's...... blues brothers is a great movie....i own the dvd :cool:
47. crazee horseSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 13:09
    did any one in G.B. see louis theroux"s documentry on the american nazi thing? we"re all entitled to our views but like monstermash says, you shouldnt preach it to your kids etc. these twats obviously have far too much time on there hands.
48. Snuff.Salvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 14:00
    did any one in G.B. see louis theroux"s documentry on the american nazi thing? we"re all entitled to our views but like monstermash says, you shouldnt preach it to your kids etc. these twats obviously have far too much time on there hands. This one: 1009039898277591286
49. Rocker KidSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 19:08
    blues brothers is a great movie....i own the dvd :cool: Me too. And the Illinois Nazi's really do exist. They're really annoying... they always have some sort of problem with somone or somthing.... and somtimes they take to the streets and march. I'd like to see them go march on the south side of Chicago!!! There wouldn't be any Nazi's left!~ :1orglaugh: And the movie. You know when they got the horn on the roof? And you know the big lake they go past? Yeah my dad used to hang around there when he was young all the time. He told me it was a big deal when the movie was being shot there.....
50. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 19:58
    Well Well Well, It's good to see that I don't have to split for too long to see that some people are still in touch with reality. Oh yes people, the Scooterkiss is back!!!! The KKK started out as a terrorist organization, and they were wrong,,,, no doubt about it!!! But were they wrong about what would become of this country??? NO... It has become a land of sickness.... Not because the black man got equal rights, but because the minority has gained so much influance. "The loudest small voice should not rule the land" The KKK is no worse than the followers of Al Sharpton or the NAACP.
51. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 20:01
    Damn Scooter.... I thought ya Dumped yer Scooter and Kissed the Pavement! Where da hell ya been? Jail? Take a few ta check out the new site...nice, huh? OH....BTW....Welcome Back! Hope all is OK!
52. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 20:09
    Damn Scooter.... I thought ya Dumped yer Scooter and Kissed the Pavement! Where da hell ya been? Jail? Take a few ta check out the new site...nice, huh? OH....BTW....Welcome Back! Hope all is OK! All is good Biggie, I just wanted to lay back and see if everyone had the big balls to tell the truth. I see that you and Snuff are still here as well ad TGD.... Things were getting a little stiff, so I tought I'd take a break and see if they got interesting again. Truth is I don't have as much free time as I used to have, it's hard to get on-line anymore. But I like this site, I don't have to aggree with everyone,,,, I just need another point of veiw to bounce off of.....:arcadefreak:
53. hunsrusSalvaged from archive19 Feb 2007, 21:52
    The difference is that black people are a minority in America, whereas white people are the majority - a majority which, to be fair, enslaved said minority and which to this day leads a proportionately less impoverished existence. I feel safe in saying that the majority of mainstream black-oriented organizations argue upon the premise that their race puts them at a social disadvantage - as do the NAACP - whereas an organization such as the KKK argues for white supremacy. It argues that white people are racially superior to darker people and, the KKK particular, that Christianity is the racial heritage of white people. I sense, however, that what you're trying to express is an anger at how "black has become a 'franchise'", which is essentially a social perception and not something you can prescribe responsibility for. You don't live here so you don't understand what's going on. Enslaving any race is wrong and I regret that my ancestors did it. The problem is that the blacks and other minorities have been compensated as well as our society can, but they have become self destructive. We can never pay blacks back for the injustices done to them, but they do have a better than equal opportunity to succeed. The problem is, a lot of them prefer to do drugs, steal, kill, and commit self-destructive acts instead of getting an education and making an honest living. They are programmed to do this from birth because society has taught them that they have no chance to succeed because they are minorities. Then they go off and blame all their problems on "Whitey". They can place the blame anywhere they want, but most of their problems are self-inflicted.
54. Snuff.Salvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 09:22
    You don't live here so you don't understand what's going on. Enslaving any race is wrong and I regret that my ancestors did it. The problem is that the blacks and other minorities have been compensated as well as our society can, but they have become self destructive. We can never pay blacks back for the injustices done to them, but they do have a better than equal opportunity to succeed. The problem is, a lot of them prefer to do drugs, steal, kill, and commit self-destructive acts instead of getting an education and making an honest living. They are programmed to do this from birth because society has taught them that they have no chance to succeed because they are minorities. Then they go off and blame all their problems on "Whitey". They can place the blame anywhere they want, but most of their problems are self-inflicted. I may not live there, but I have the experience and research to know that America lacks an active policy of integration. You can't just chuck an oppressed minority some welfare cheques and tell them to get an education. You need to regenerate urban areas and pursue the integration of said minorities into the areas in which the majority is...well, the majority. Europe has the same problem. The difference is that we've not had an erroneous minority population in existence on such a large scale as the States before policies to deal with them and the very concept of social integration came into existence. Thus, we've dealth with a trickle and a flow and matched pace - whereas America has had this great lake of disaffection to tap. Look at the French riots next - they too have faced difficulties in integrating the population of the Parisian suburbs (AKA Ghettos) with the mainstream of Parisian society. Consequently they have faced riots. These are social problems, quantifiable on the same scale as the larger population and NOT the individual. The only thing wrong with Reverend Al Sharpton is his citing of isolated incidents. This is a strategy to gain awareness. You may not like it, but he's fighting for a damn good cause. Take a walk through Harlem and tell me otherwise. While America can draw a line between white and black areas, these problems will remain.
55. BrixtonSalvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 09:37
    I may not live there, but I have the experience and research to know that America lacks an active policy of integration. Aint that right, didnt they only abolish seperate public busses in the 1960's? you know the ones - whites at the front blacks at the back. America has a very young history compaired to say Britian. It was only 150 years ago that the USA government paid 100 US dollars per RedIndian scalp they received. I told this to an American friend of mine the other day, it was the fiorst she had heard of it. Convieniently, they miss some stuff on their sylabous when looking a their own history. Nasty History. :rasta:
56. Snuff.Salvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 09:47
    Aint that right, didnt they only abolish seperate public busses in the 1960's? you know the ones - whites at the front blacks at the back. America has a very young history compaired to say Britian. It was only 150 years ago that the USA government paid 100 US dollars per RedIndian scalp they received. I told this to an American friend of mine the other day, it was the fiorst she had heard of it. Convieniently, they miss some stuff on their sylabous when looking a their own history. Nasty History. :rasta: All history's pretty much nasty. The only reason slavery was abolished first in Britain was because the Portuguese and the Dutch were getting ahead of our game. I'm not sure about the point you're trying to make here, Brixton. You seem of this clique that feels threatened by American expansionism, and translates this into fervent anti-Americanism. What your lot need to realise is that we're in this game together. Even when the moves of one power threaten the interests of another - in relation to the great powers the ends are the same. Everyone of the players profit somewhere down the line, the only question and cause of contention is when and how much.
57. BrixtonSalvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 09:53
    I'm not sure about the point you're trying to make here, Brixton. You seem of this clique that feels threatened by American expansionism, and translates this into fervent anti-Americanism. . Ney ney sir, Im not anti-american, was just pointing out a point to further your point that ''America lacks an active policy of integration'' I thought a tale of ther recent history would help. :smokin:
58. Snuff.Salvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 09:59
    Ney ney sir, Im not anti-american, was just pointing out a point to further your point that ''America lacks an active policy of integration'' I thought a tale of ther recent history would help. :smokin: Hmm...I was lifting boxes 'til three this morning. You'll have to forgive me for any misunderstanding. :p
59. BrixtonSalvaged from archive20 Feb 2007, 10:04
    You are forgiven!! lol I hope the boxes were empty!!
60. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive23 Feb 2007, 16:54
    Aint that right, didnt they only abolish seperate public busses in the 1960's? you know the ones - whites at the front blacks at the back. America has a very young history compaired to say Britian. It was only 150 years ago that the USA government paid 100 US dollars per RedIndian scalp they received. I told this to an American friend of mine the other day, it was the fiorst she had heard of it. Convieniently, they miss some stuff on their sylabous when looking a their own history. Nasty History. :rasta: I have Indian blood, the native Indians have a far bigger bone to pick than the blacks in the U.S. today. They lost their land and were killed as a matter of U.S. policy. The big differance between them and blacks is that they took responsability for themselves and stopped asking for a handout to fix what happened ages ago. They own some of the most valuable property in the States and make a killing with their casinos and construction companies. Truth is,,, like it or not,,, blacks in the U.S. have it far better than they would if they had been born in Africa, yet they bitch and moan and demand special treatment through "equal oportunity" laws. Al Sharpton is a leach on his own people, everytime he demands "fairness" for a black thug killer who was "mistreated" while attacking policemen he drags his whole race along with him. The problem is that too many blacks follow him and his like in hopes of getting something (for free) they don't deserve. I live in the heart of the south, we have a larger black population than the northern states and I can tell you first hand.... blacks in the workplace use their race like a hammer against management,,, they get away with murder just by threatining a discrimination lawsuit. They get out of court settlements so easily it would make your head spin. They know it too, that is what keeps people like Al Sharpton going. He just latches on to the biggest payout for blacks he can find and ramps up the propaganda machine..... I would never join the KKK, they act as badly as Sharpton and the NAACP. They get treated as low lifes while the NAACP gets undue respect but in the end they are two sides of the same coin. At the same time I see the KKK's point, they are pissed that blacks today use slavery as a scapegoat when they would probably be chaseing their dinner with a sharp stick in Africa if their ancestors hadn't been slaves. They already GOT their reparations,,, they live in America, where they can be anything they set their minds too, including an oppertunistic race monger like Al Sharpton!!!
61. hunsrusSalvaged from archive23 Feb 2007, 19:39
    I have Indian blood, the native Indians have a far bigger bone to pick than the blacks in the U.S. today. They lost their land and were killed as a matter of U.S. policy. The big differance between them and blacks is that they took responsability for themselves and stopped asking for a handout to fix what happened ages ago. They own some of the most valuable property in the States and make a killing with their casinos and construction companies. Truth is,,, like it or not,,, blacks in the U.S. have it far better than they would if they had been born in Africa, yet they bitch and moan and demand special treatment through "equal oportunity" laws. Al Sharpton is a leach on his own people, everytime he demands "fairness" for a black thug killer who was "mistreated" while attacking policemen he drags his whole race along with him. The problem is that too many blacks follow him and his like in hopes of getting something (for free) they don't deserve. I live in the heart of the south, we have a larger black population than the northern states and I can tell you first hand.... blacks in the workplace use their race like a hammer against management,,, they get away with murder just by threatining a discrimination lawsuit. They get out of court settlements so easily it would make your head spin. They know it too, that is what keeps people like Al Sharpton going. He just latches on to the biggest payout for blacks he can find and ramps up the propaganda machine..... I would never join the KKK, they act as badly as Sharpton and the NAACP. They get treated as low lifes while the NAACP gets undue respect but in the end they are two sides of the same coin. At the same time I see the KKK's point, they are pissed that blacks today use slavery as a scapegoat when they would probably be chaseing their dinner with a sharp stick in Africa if their ancestors hadn't been slaves. They already GOT their reparations,,, they live in America, where they can be anything they set their minds too, including an oppertunistic race monger like Al Sharpton!!! Very well said!:xyxthumbs:
62. Snuff.Salvaged from archive24 Feb 2007, 06:58
    They already GOT their reparations,,, they live in America, where they can be anything they set their minds too, including an oppertunistic race monger like Al Sharpton!!! Check out my thread in Uploads. You've obviously not seen Sharpton's "office", and I feel you talk before you think.
63. The JokerSalvaged from archive24 Feb 2007, 14:20
    The KKK will never rise to power again...it is close to impossible in the US nowadays....
64. gwaneSalvaged from archive24 Feb 2007, 23:28
    I have Indian blood, the native Indians have a far bigger bone to pick than the blacks in the U.S. today. They lost their land and were killed as a matter of U.S. policy. The big differance between them and blacks is that they took responsability for themselves and stopped asking for a handout to fix what happened ages ago. They own some of the most valuable property in the States and make a killing with their casinos and construction companies. Truth is,,, like it or not,,, blacks in the U.S. have it far better than they would if they had been born in Africa, yet they bitch and moan and demand special treatment through "equal oportunity" laws. Al Sharpton is a leach on his own people, everytime he demands "fairness" for a black thug killer who was "mistreated" while attacking policemen he drags his whole race along with him. The problem is that too many blacks follow him and his like in hopes of getting something (for free) they don't deserve. I live in the heart of the south, we have a larger black population than the northern states and I can tell you first hand.... blacks in the workplace use their race like a hammer against management,,, they get away with murder just by threatining a discrimination lawsuit. They get out of court settlements so easily it would make your head spin. They know it too, that is what keeps people like Al Sharpton going. He just latches on to the biggest payout for blacks he can find and ramps up the propaganda machine..... I would never join the KKK, they act as badly as Sharpton and the NAACP. They get treated as low lifes while the NAACP gets undue respect but in the end they are two sides of the same coin. At the same time I see the KKK's point, they are pissed that blacks today use slavery as a scapegoat when they would probably be chaseing their dinner with a sharp stick in Africa if their ancestors hadn't been slaves. They already GOT their reparations,,, they live in America, where they can be anything they set their minds too, including an oppertunistic race monger like Al Sharpton!!! Dud your full of shit and you need to shut the fuck up.. blacks in the U.S. have it far better than they would if they had been born in Africa How the fuck would you know , why don't you try selling the line to the indians . and let not forget Africa was raped along with it people .. so yeah black have it better in US because there mother land was raped also so what there to go back too!?!? Thats like kidnapping a new born child from there home then burning the home down, then raping and abusing the child all there lives, then saying now get the fuck out.. we don't want you hear. and you have the nerve to say they can't complain. What make this so bad and sad you admit the whites did the Indians and the black wrong but yet you don't know why they hate you for saying stupid shit like this.
65. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive25 Feb 2007, 18:46
    Dud your full of shit and you need to shut the fuck up.. blacks in the U.S. have it far better than they would if they had been born in Africa How the fuck would you know , why don't you try selling the line to the indians . and let not forget Africa was raped along with it people .. so yeah black have it better in US because there mother land was raped also so what there to go back too!?!? Thats like kidnapping a new born child from there home then burning the home down, then raping and abusing the child all there lives, then saying now get the fuck out.. we don't want you hear. and you have the nerve to say they can't complain. What make this so bad and sad you admit the whites did the Indians and the black wrong but yet you don't know why they hate you for saying stupid shit like this. Suck me numb-nuts, did you read my last post? I have Cherokee and Blackfoot blood in my veins. The blacks in the U.S. have no claim to reperations, as a people they thrive in the U.S. better than any other country they have been transposed to due to slavery. The African slave trade was practiced by every country in the world, none of them have made reperations so why should the U.S.? Also the African slave trade was a product of African tribal wars in the first place. Do you really beleive that a boat full of white men hit shore and captured blacks?... Hell no, they landed and bought Africans from Africans who were more than happy to sell their tribal enemies that were captured in tribal wars... Every black man sold into slavery was bought from another black man to start the cycle. Why don't the Afro-Americans go to Africa and ask for financial reperations? Because most Balck African governments don't have any money and wouldn't give it to African-Americans who live better than their own countrymen to now anyway. So... to use your example. They set their own house on fire, grabbed the ones lucky enough to escape and tossed them on a ship to be used and abused by the rest of the world. In the mean time the ones sold away started the seed for a race that thrived everywhere other than their homeland. All THAT said, lets get back to the original issue. The KKK started out as a terrorist organization led by Confederate Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest whose purpose was to protect the interest (and lives) of southern land owners after the civil war. It thrived and grew due to the U.S. government, which for a 100 years kept the south under it's thumb and decimated it's culture..... a culture it benifited from BEFORE and AFTER the civil war REMEMBER!!! History is written by the victor, but history is still history!!! Read a book that wasn't issued to you in a government run school. The first thing you will learn is that even though you have been tought that the war was fought over slavery, the emmacipaction proclomation wasn't written untill the war was 2 years old. THERE IS MUCH MORE IF YOU CARE TO BE INFORMED RATHER THAN A FOLLOWER OF REVISIONISM!!! Todays KKK is misguided but they are no worse than the NAACP!!! They are both racist organizations whos only interest is to give people of their own race an advantage.... In short they are both racist organizations that BOTH started with good intentions of equal oppertunity and became twisted by self interest by it's leaders.
66. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive25 Feb 2007, 19:25
    Check out my thread in Uploads. You've obviously not seen Sharpton's "office", and I feel you talk before you think. With all due respect Snuff I "talk" from actual experiance. Al Sharpton is a persona that has finaly begun to be rejected by the majority of the black population. They are begining to understand that the role of victem is a falsehood, and one that does not serve their interests. As an example (one that can not be applied to EVERY situation) ... I work in a factory that employs as many blacks as whites. Two years ago a black man was hired who took great pleasure in threating people to get away with not doing his job, he was very large and was a black belt in martial arts. He was finally fired and he got a NAACP lawyer to represent him in a unlawful termination suit... the company payed him $90,000 to drop the suit. A year ago a white man who did very much the same thing was fired.... he could not find a lawyer to take his case... he was paid nothing to go away. BUT if he HAD found a lawyer who had a reputation as a KKK lawyer do you think he would have been paid, or taken to court?........ My bet is that the company would have gone to court and won based on the reputation of the lawyer. But the company decided that the black man with an NAACP lawyer was a serious risk. Racism is alive and well in the politicaly correct world and the black activist is winning. I don't know what Al Sharpton's office looks like, but I've seen him arrive at rallies in a limo and I know he raised enough money to run for president in the last election................. He's got more money in the bank than Al Capone had........... But he's WAY more untouchable.... he's got slavery on his side....:cool:
67. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive7 Mar 2007, 17:05
    http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e59/ufntool/ThePearlyGa…
68. Mr. CorruptorSalvaged from archive7 Mar 2007, 18:29
    hahahahah owned!
69. RhomphaiaSalvaged from archive7 Mar 2007, 19:15
    REMEMBER!!! History is written by the victor, but history is still history!!! Read a book that wasn't issued to you in a government run school. The first thing you will learn is that even though you have been tought that the war was fought over slavery, the emmacipaction proclomation wasn't written untill the war was 2 years old. THERE IS MUCH MORE IF YOU CARE TO BE INFORMED RATHER THAN A FOLLOWER OF REVISIONISM!!! The war was waged mainly due to the resources the Confederate States of America would have taken with them if a secession had succeeded (and for a few years it did). Large crops and some hefty coal resources would have been taken. There were other reasons as well, largely idealogical, but the loss of land and access to the Gulf of Mexico were the two major reasons why the USA fought the CSA. The south was in a financial mess due to northern meddling and so they wished to break away. The Confederates simply wanted to do things their own way and in hindsight, I personally believe they were right to try and seceede. The mostly urban north was trying to impose its way of life on the mostly rural south and it was sending the south's economy into the shitter. The war was about much more than slavery and the reasons that Lincoln may have signed the Emancipation Proclamation are many and probably had just as much to do with political gain as they had to do with altruism.
70. ScooterkissSalvaged from archive8 Mar 2007, 08:24
    The war was waged mainly due to the resources the Confederate States of America would have taken with them if a secession had succeeded (and for a few years it did). Large crops and some hefty coal resources would have been taken. There were other reasons as well, largely idealogical, but the loss of land and access to the Gulf of Mexico were the two major reasons why the USA fought the CSA. The south was in a financial mess due to northern meddling and so they wished to break away. The Confederates simply wanted to do things their own way and in hindsight, I personally believe they were right to try and seceede. The mostly urban north was trying to impose its way of life on the mostly rural south and it was sending the south's economy into the shitter. The war was about much more than slavery and the reasons that Lincoln may have signed the Emancipation Proclamation are many and probably had just as much to do with political gain as they had to do with altruism. Well said. One of Lincoln's main reason for signing the Emacapation Proclomation was the fact that the war was not very popular with citizens of the north and inlistment in the yankee army was low which forced him to implement a draft. The draft was causeing riots in the north (one was depicted in the movie "Gangs of New York"). Lincoln was in jepardy of loseing the war and support for his presidency and his party. Abolishment of slavery was a very popular concept in the north however and inlistment skyrocketed when he signed the Proclomation. If not for the "War of Northern Aggresion" the south would have ended slavery on it's own in a short time due to the high costs of maintaining slaves and the invention of farm machinery that could do more work for less cost. Left to it's own the south would have natually proggresed away from slavery and there would have been no KKK in the first place. In short thank Abraham Lincoln for the KKK and the racial strife that took so many years to overcome.

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.