Go back to2005
21 years laterFileCabi is back..Read the story →

The Forum › The Latest Videos FileCabi Forum (2005–2006)

Video - Michael Crook takes a pounding on Fox News

This topic was the comments for this video (the video itself was lost).

Salvaged from archive These posts were salvaged from the web archive of the original FileCabi forum (2005–2006). Usernames are as they were then and aren’t linked to today’s accounts.
  1. FileCabi.netRobot27 Nov 2005, 01:40
    Video - Michael Crook takes a pounding on Fox News http://www.filecabi.net/video/MichaelCrook.html
  2. GuestSalvaged from archive27 Dec 2005, 16:30
    Grade A Dumb ASS
  3. ErsSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2005, 00:57
    Who is dumb? Sweden does not need to have a standing military to defend our freedom of speach! If you send out soliders to steal oil you have to understand that they will fight back. But violence is not neccesary if you treat other countries (and people) with respect. Who is ignorant now?
  4. LoLSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2005, 06:36
    Saddam was committing Genocide, maybe the real reason was oil, who cares? Atleast that f'ing dictator isn't over there killing, torturing, and raping people.
  5. ErsSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2005, 15:25
    No... Now it is the American soliders that are there killing, torturing and abusing.
  6. GuestSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2005, 16:04
    Ers wrote:
  7. CaidSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2005, 16:40
    Ers - Your argument is irrelevant. Michael Crook wasn't approaching anything with those considerations or factors involved. Seems all he had was an argument about their wages. Which was silly to make a big deal about. He's just an attention whore. And to the 'Guest' up above, there's a difference in 'earned' respect and 'forced' respect. It's much better to live in mutual respect than a fearful respect. Neither side of this argument between you and Ers is balanced. The two sides are two extremes. US is a nice country with its pros and cons as Sweden is a nice country with its pros and cons.
  8. ErsSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2005, 08:37
    You ended this conversation caid. Very Happy
  9. GuestSalvaged from archive1 Jan 2006, 16:14
    He is just a moron!
  10. Combat MedicSalvaged from archive2 Jan 2006, 06:55
    ers. nobody blew up two of the biggest buildings in your most populated city either. And, you may not have a standing army, but you do have elite forces and counter terrorism units that are all trained like US soldiers. and they have aided the US in iraq during OIF....
  11. AzzecSalvaged from archive3 Jan 2006, 03:37
    How does sending Troops to iraq give ANYONE the freedom of speech, excuse ME but hello i am speaking, i dont agree with this prick what hes saying but no soldiers give me the right to speak and not speak so DO NOT give me that bullshit. I can say what i want when i want, NO ONE can take away my Freedom of speach or give it to me, its more Patriotic Capitalist Propaganda bullshit. Good day from the UK. http://www.ranting-gryphon.com/Rants/2rant-iraq.mp3 ~ Look at this.
  12. ErsSalvaged from archive3 Jan 2006, 09:48
    Exactly Azzec! Troops are not defending our freedom of speach! They are after the oil and has 9/11 as a good cover to invade Iraq!
  13. anonymous.Salvaged from archive3 Jan 2006, 15:49
    but Michael Crook doesn't say anything about that. his claim is that all soldiers are dumbasses for joining the military...hes attacking the wrong people
  14. game_freak99Salvaged from archive3 Jan 2006, 15:49
    OK first of all i dont think that any of yous have the right to be saying these things about soldiers unless you have been soldier. How r yous all gonna says that the sldiers are all there to steal oil, thats all BS. That guy on thevideo is right u wouldnt even be able to say all the bull yous are saying with out troops defending this country. The U.S. is one of the most free countrys because of the fact that troops are fought for it. Going to the th middle East was a big mistake but we cant just send our troops back now, we have to rebuild it. And if we did go to the middle east for ol that didnt work out so well now did it.
  15. ErsSalvaged from archive3 Jan 2006, 16:12
    Ok... Sorry! I wrote it wrong! What I meant was that troops are (were) SENT to Iraq to take the oil. And if they now are there to rebuild what they have destroyed, well... then it is good! But I have seen horible vids of US soldiers "cleaning" out houses! Sad

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.