The Forum › Everything Else FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)

equality and the military

1. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 01:26
   don't ask don't tell may end, women are going to be allowed on submarines, debate on allowing women in full combat roles... i think a lot of these decisions are being fueled by a public that will gladly make something equal just for the sake of being equal & fair. curious to see what u guys thought, and since most here aren't from the states what ur military has set up for gays & women in the military.
2. JooXSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 02:01
   I want to be able to give birth to children without having a uterus. Even if I don't want children. If this doesn't happen... I will sue everyone! PC crock of shit throwing ball.
3. Heero ValentineSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 04:40
   i don't mind if they join...as long as they can take the job! if your capabilities are far below average...they shouldn't allow you as woman in the army/marine or whatever.
4. Echo1Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 08:26
   women dont belong in the Marine Corps. ive seen how they perform. always lagging, falling out.. whatever. bottom line is if i get myself in the shit, i dont want to have to rely on a women to get my ass out. unless shes 6'3" and on roids. cause she wont be able to carry my ass. navy and AF are meh.. theres tons of non combat roles that women can do. edit: but yea im sick of this PC bullshit trying to ruin the military. its not your typical office job. theres restrictions for a reason. because if you cant do your job PEOPLE DIE! ive said it before, ill say it again. it is NOT a constitutional right to serve in the military.
5. NanabungaSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 08:32
   women dont belong in the Marine Corps. ive seen how they perform. always lagging, falling out.. whatever. bottom line is if i get myself in the shit, i dont want to have to rely on a women to get my ass out. unless shes 6'3" and on roids. cause she wont be able to carry my ass. Agree with that roihgt theeya matey... there are some 'women' in this world who are more manly than most and if they can cut it then so be it. Allowing them in simply because of their gender would be suicide for them and murder for their fellow soldiers, not cool. navy and AF are meh.. theres tons of non combat roles that women can do. There are a couple of excellent pilots who have vaginas, if they can drop precision bombs on target or shoot down the enemy then I aint gots no beefs with that either.
6. MCMXCIISalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 08:39
   For one, women can't handle all the physical strains that men can. It's not matcho, it's biology, so that would take them out of infantry roles I guess. I have no objections to women being in the Air Force or the Navy, where their physical ability isn't needed as much, and where they can have non-combatant roles, like Echo said. Second, if you, as a woman are comfortable with being in a submerged submarine with a bunch of horny sailors, then sure, knock yourself out. :D
7. RaidenatorSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 11:07
   I don't have a problem at all with homos in the military, so as far as don't ask don't tell is concerned I'm all for it. As for women, I say give them the opportunity. But if they can't cut the mustard then they can't bitch about it. If they can't keep up with the men when performing these tasks then tough fucking luck. They shouldn't be kept out simply because they're women, but they certainly should be kept out of they're weak or what not.
8. HeyBuddySalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 12:55
   I don't really care who serves where, as long as we don't lower standards. The impression I get though is that when there are women involved, the standards are lower. I still remember that fat bitch that was taken hostage in Iraq talking on Oprah. I have friends in the military, and they are constantly having someone jump down their throat about their body fat. Yet, I've seen some FAT bitches in the military. This fat bitch on Oprah was fat when we got her back from the insurgent. Then, she was talking about how they had gone through her pack. Oprah asked what was in her pack. She listed off make-up, hair dryer, moisturizer, etc. When did we stop carrying guns? The one place where I don't want to see women at all in the military, regardless of their capabilities, would be submarines. The only way I would put a woman in a sub, would be if it was an all woman sub. It's very close quarters. We're talking about young people, with very little entertainment that are confined for long periods of time. I don't want to see a military submarine make an unscheduled surface to unload a pregnant woman. I don't want to hear about sexual harassment from someone who has to share a tiny bunk just inches from someone else. It's not worth it. Seriously, the military shouldn't always have to be fair. My buddy was turned away from the nuclear program because he was color blind. I'm okay with that. Really, I'm pretty happy to hear that we do have that type of standard, even if it is discriminatory.
9. mousewallratSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 17:15
   I can see it now...the Dyke Division. Why not? Send those fuckers into the really bad shit. Too many of them around anyway.
10. Echo1Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 17:27
    There are a couple of excellent pilots who have vaginas, if they can drop precision bombs on target or shoot down the enemy then I aint gots no beefs with that either. when i said non combat i meant boots on the ground. and yes.. i know fighter pilots blah blah blah.. but i was getting at the infantry. I don't really care who serves where, as long as we don't lower standards. The impression I get though is that when there are women involved, the standards are lower. I still remember that fat bitch that was taken hostage in Iraq talking on Oprah. the mens perfect score for the run on our PFT is 18 minutes. the females is 21 minutes.
11. JooXSalvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 18:07
    I don't really care who serves where, as long as we don't lower standards. The impression I get though is that when there are women involved, the standards are lower. I still remember that fat bitch that was taken hostage in Iraq talking on Oprah. I have friends in the military, and they are constantly having someone jump down their throat about their body fat. Yet, I've seen some FAT bitches in the military. This fat bitch on Oprah was fat when we got her back from the insurgent. Then, she was talking about how they had gone through her pack. Oprah asked what was in her pack. She listed off make-up, hair dryer, moisturizer, etc. When did we stop carrying guns? The one place where I don't want to see women at all in the military, regardless of their capabilities, would be submarines. The only way I would put a woman in a sub, would be if it was an all woman sub. It's very close quarters. We're talking about young people, with very little entertainment that are confined for long periods of time. I don't want to see a military submarine make an unscheduled surface to unload a pregnant woman. I don't want to hear about sexual harassment from someone who has to share a tiny bunk just inches from someone else. It's not worth it. Seriously, the military shouldn't always have to be fair. My buddy was turned away from the nuclear program because he was color blind. I'm okay with that. Really, I'm pretty happy to hear that we do have that type of standard, even if it is discriminatory. That's the real worry. :wth:
12. silenthill22Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 20:18
    http://www.spareammo.com/posters/hello-kitty-pink-ar-15-a… :omg: :rolleyes2:
13. Echo1Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 20:19
    http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb164/XopekQD/fuuuuu.jpg
14. ceehound619Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 21:49
    the mens perfect score for the run on our PFT is 18 minutes. the females is 21 minutes. then that is discriminatory....and I am surprised someone hasnt sued over that.... or have they.
15. Echo1Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 22:06
    idk. but the shit pissed me off. they were ALWAYS getting in the fucking way. dropping (literally) like flies on the humps and becoming fuckin obstacles on the trail. getting in the way on certain courses where theres obstacles and running. FUCK!
16. ceehound619Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 22:13
    [quote=Echo1;614235] they were ALWAYS dropping (literally) like flies on the humps and becoming fuckin obstacles on the trail. quote] betta foe me when i drag dey tired azz in2 da bushes n have my way.
17. Echo1Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 22:29
    trust me. you dont wanna do that :omg: http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs029.snc3/11650_1005826433… 8_n.jpg
18. ceehound619Salvaged from archive1 Mar 2010, 22:33
    ^^^^ no!!!!!!!............. kill it wit fyre!!!!!!!...... wait.... who am i foolin???.......... id turn her azzhole insyde out. :omg:
19. NanabungaSalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 11:49
    when i said non combat i meant boots on the ground. and yes.. i know fighter pilots blah blah blah.. but i was getting at the infantry. No need to get lippy motherfucker. I wasn't arguing with you, I was just sayin' :drinkup:
20. HeyBuddySalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 11:52
    the mens perfect score for the run on our PFT is 18 minutes. the females is 21 minutes. Don't get me wrong. When we're being chased, I appreciate there being someone slower. If they just want to be there for capture, and back armor that's fine.
21. HeyBuddySalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 11:53
    trust me. you dont wanna do that :omg: http://hphotos-snc3.fbcdn.net/hs029.snc3/11650_1005826433… 8_n.jpg ^^^^ no!!!!!!!............. kill it wit fyre!!!!!!!...... wait.... who am i foolin???.......... id turn her azzhole insyde out. :omg: You really thought that you could find a woman that cee wouldn't fuck?
22. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 18:34
    ^^^.... if its tyte, its ryte.
23. MCMXCIISalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 18:43
    ^^^.... if its tyte, its ryte. Why use the letter "y" you fucking moron? It's just as easy to spell it correctly. Look at me, I'm pretty drunk right now and I can still spell. :wth:
24. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 18:52
    Why use the letter "y" you fucking moron? :wth: cuz i 2 quik on mye toez 2 git caught up wit u hoes.
25. QuackersSalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:27
    Why use the letter "y" you fucking moron? It's just as easy to spell it correctly. Look at me, I'm pretty drunk right now and I can still spell. :wth: Because he's a complete fucking moron.
26. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:29
    Because he's a complete fucking moron. gud call captain hypocrite.
27. boo_cockySalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:39
    I didn't bother to read the posts here, just the title of the thread. I think women have their place in the military, but it's not on the front line. I don't really give a shit if people find that sexist, it's not. I don't think I belong on the front line, either...which is why it's generally kids between the ages of 18 and 21. I'd be of more use training these kids, not fighting along side them. Women would be of more use sucking their cocks after a long battle, not changing their tampons along side them. /end
28. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:41
    I didn't bother to read the posts here, just the title of the thread. I think women have their place in the military, but it's not on the front line. I don't really give a shit if people find that sexist, it's not. I don't think I belong on the front line, either...which is why it's generally kids between the ages of 18 and 21. I'd be of more use training these kids, not fighting along side them. Women would be of more use sucking their cocks after a long battle, not changing their tampons along side them. /end agree/end
29. Echo1Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:44
    I didn't bother to read the posts here, just the title of the thread. I think women have their place in the military, but it's not on the front line. I don't really give a shit if people find that sexist, it's not. I don't think I belong on the front line, either...which is why it's generally kids between the ages of 18 and 21. I'd be of more use training these kids, not fighting along side them. Women would be of more use sucking their cocks after a long battle, not changing their tampons along side them. /end disagree. yes the guys kicking the doors in are young, but they need the older more experienced men there to control/lead them.
30. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:45
    disagree. yes the guys kicking the doors in are young, but they need the older more experienced men there to control/lead them. no.. the more stupid brain dead 20 yr old schmucks dead.. .the better..... GOD SENT IED's!!!!!
31. Echo1Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:47
    say that at work. see how your day goes.
32. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:49
    DIIIIEEEEE UUUU STUUUPPPIDDDD FFUUUKKKKK!!!!! :thumb: :omg: :wth:
33. Echo1Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 20:51
    lewlz..
34. boo_cockySalvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 21:11
    gud call captain hypocrite. Cee...Quackers may be a lot of things, but he's not half the moron you are. A 41 year old man deliberately typing like that little bitch TGD...you're going to end up a fucking truck driver if you're not careful, dumbass.
35. ceehound619Salvaged from archive2 Mar 2010, 21:14
    Cee...Quackers may be a lot of things, but he's not half the moron you are. A 41 year old man deliberately typing like that little bitch TGD...you're going to end up a fucking truck driver if you're not careful, dumbass. unlike you... I refuse to be defined by what I do for employment.....thats your burden not mine.....I love what I do....and am not shamed of it.... nor do i give a fuk what you.... or anyone else on gods green earth thinks of it..............and..........rick........ u aint exactly at the top of the barrell in that category skipper....far as quackers.... I disagree.... he has all the redeeming value of a piece of freshly laid dogshit.
36. steph-styleSalvaged from archive3 Mar 2010, 11:02
    Why are you all against women in the army? Someone's got to make the samwiches for the troops.
37. JACKASS2010Salvaged from archive3 Mar 2010, 11:37
    they were ALWAYS dropping (literally) like flies on the humps and becoming fuckin obstacles on the trail. betta foe me when i drag dey tired azz in2 da bushes n have my way. ^^^^ no!!!!!!!............. kill it wit fyre!!!!!!!...... wait.... who am i foolin???.......... id turn her azzhole insyde out. :omg: ^^^.... if its tyte, its ryte. cuz i 2 quik on mye toez 2 git caught up wit u hoes. unlike you... I refuse to be defined by what I do for employment.....thats your burden not mine.....I love what I do....and am not shamed of it.... nor do i give a fuk what you.... or anyone else on gods green earth thinks of it..............and..........rick........ u aint exactly at the top of the barrell in that category skipper....far as quackers.... I disagree.... he has all the redeeming value of a piece of freshly laid dogshit. See? he doesn't type like an illiterate retard when he wants to. tgd is the same. one thing tho cee, learn how to quote properly. if you can't be bothered to type the "[/" when you highlight and erase, just click the cursor at the end and hold backspace.
38. JACKASS2010Salvaged from archive3 Mar 2010, 11:41
    oh and about the subject topic.bitches should be allowed to serve if they can cut the mustard. they should also be gangraped once in a while to desenstize them to it, cos if they get caught behind enemy lines that's the first thing thats going to happen to them.
39. ceehound619Salvaged from archive3 Mar 2010, 18:48
    Why are you all against women in the army? Someone's got to make the samwiches for the troops. and give blow jobs as a prior poster stated.
40. ceehound619Salvaged from archive3 Mar 2010, 18:52
    one thing tho cee, learn how to quote properly. if you can't be bothered to type the "[/" when you highlight and erase, just click the cursor at the end and hold backspace. sure thing kid.
41. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 14:04
    been in the navy a year now, and i can tell you that women in subs is a BAD FUCKING IDEA. idk. but the shit pissed me off. they were ALWAYS getting in the fucking way. dropping (literally) like flies on the humps and becoming fuckin obstacles on the trail. getting in the way on certain courses where theres obstacles and running. FUCK! exactly, we don't do any of that stuff but during PT it's always the women falling out and getting in the way(because falling out for a female is start walking in the middle of the formation) i don't understand why ppl want don't ask, don't tell repealed though. it works fine, and it isn't denying homosexuals to serve. they can't be 100% open about it, but it's a sexual preference. you don't see dominatrixs complaining that they can't be open about their sexual preferences.
42. Echo1Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 14:12
    aye, im sick of civilians telling the military how to run things.
43. ceehound619Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 18:20
    aye, im sick of civilians telling the military how to run things. lols.... if the marine corps was 100% military.... we would not win one war..... count on that.
44. Echo1Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 18:27
    yea and how many people who have absolutely nothing to do with the military bitch about it.
45. ceehound619Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 18:43
    yea and how many people who have absolutely nothing to do with the military bitch about it. so to bitch about football I have to be a football player?
46. Echo1Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 18:48
    apples and oranges
47. ceehound619Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 19:05
    apples and oranges disagree but hey/....... its your right to be wrong. :thumb:...to play devils advocate..... if my tax money is supporting something.....that gives me all the right in the world to bitch... yes?
48. Echo1Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 20:46
    so i was just watchin a show on boot. and they were interviewing the recruits n all the females were bitchin like "i didnt know thered be this much yelling" and "if war is anything like this its crazy" and "i dont think you need to yell at people this much to get them to do things but thats just my philosophy" and "i guess were here to learn how to kill people" FUCKING DISGUSTING!!! all the guys were like "its good to go. bring it" /end thread
49. boo_cockySalvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 23:13
    disagree but hey/....... its your right to be wrong. :thumb:...to play devils advocate..... if my tax money is supporting something.....that gives me all the right in the world to bitch... yes? No. You're a retard. You're not allowed to have rights. That is all.
50. ceehound619Salvaged from archive4 Mar 2010, 23:33
    No. You're a retard. You're not allowed to have rights. That is all. shud da fuk up doublemint chin.

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.