Go back to2005
21 years laterFileCabi is back..Read the story →

The Forum › Everything Else FileCabi.net Forum (2007–2008)

SADDAM Death Sentence Upheld in Baghdad

Salvaged from archive These posts were salvaged from the web archive of the original FileCabi forum (2007–2008). Usernames are as they were then and aren’t linked to today’s accounts.
  1. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 17:39
    Iraqi court upholds Saddam’s death sentence Ex-leader must be hanged within 30 days for killing of Shiites, judge rules • Death sentence for Saddam Dec. 26: An Iraqi appeals court upheld the sentence of death for Saddam Hussein. Under a statute governing the Iraqi high tribunal, the death sentence must be carried out within weeks. NBC's Richard Engel reports. Updated: 1 hour, 55 minutes ago BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq’s highest appeals court on Tuesday upheld Saddam Hussein’s death sentence and said he must be hanged within 30 days for the killing of 148 Shiites in the central city of Dujail. The sentence “must be implemented within 30 days,” chief judge Aref Shahin said. “From tomorrow, any day could be the day of implementation.” On Nov. 5, an Iraqi court sentenced Saddam to the gallows for ordering the 1982 killings following an attempt on his life. Under Iraqi law, the appeals court decision must be ratified by President Jalal Talabani and Iraq’s two vice presidents. Talabani opposes the death penalty but has in the past deputized a vice president to sign an execution order on his behalf — a substitute that was legally accepted. Raed Juhi, a spokesman for the High Tribunal court that convicted Saddam, said the judicial system would ensure that Saddam is executed even if Talabani and the two vice presidents do not ratify the decision. “We’ll implement the verdict by the power of the law,” Juhi said. He did not elaborate. The appeals court also upheld death sentences for Barzan Ibrahim, Saddam’s half brother and intelligence chief during the Dujail killings, and Awad Hamed al-Bandar, head of Iraq’s Revolutionary Court, which issued the death sentences against the Dujail residents. The appeals court concluded the sentence of life imprisonment given to former vice president Taha Yassin Ramadan was too lenient and returned his file to the High Tribunal. Ramadan was convicted of premeditated murder in the Dujail case. “We demand that he be sentenced to death,” said Shahin, the appeals judge.
  2. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 17:43
    A senior Iraqi government official tells me Tuesday night that the execution of Saddam Hussein will be carried out this way: On the day of the execution, Saddam will be taken to the gallows now used to execute “terrorists and criminals.” He will not be given special treatment. He will be dressed in either a green or an orange jumpsuit. He will be handcuffed. His feet will be chained, with only enough slack so he can shuffle up the stairs to the gallows. He will be hooded. He will wear prison sandals. The hangman will also be hooded, but with a hood with eyeholes so he can see to pull a lever, releasing a trap door, dropping Saddam. The gallows are made of steel, 15 feet off the ground. The gallows have been built with American supervision to meet "human rights standards." The old gallows had an old rope that had become elastic. There is now a new rope designed to snap Saddam's neck, not strangle him. Before the execution, not expected before the new year, Saddam will be given a final meal, and time to smoke, pray and write a will. This could take several hours. A doctor will check Saddam's health before the execution and remain on hand to verify his death. The execution will be filmed for the Iraqi government archives. Limited footage of the execution will be broadcast on Iraqi state television. --Richard Engel, NBC Middle East Correspondent
  3. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 17:51
    http://www.aljazeera.com/cgi-bin/conspiracy_theory/admin/… ts%20in%20front%20of%20an%20Iraqi%20judge%20in%20B aghdad.jpg "Now you'd best make sure that all dem Virgins are dare waiting for me!"
  4. AllisterFiendSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 17:52
    The gallows have been built with American supervision to meet "human rights standards." :lol: :lol:
  5. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 17:58
    "The old gallows had an old rope that had become elastic." The Hanging: The knot is tied...the hood adjusted...the lever pulled...Sadam drops... Boooiiiinnngggg!...SADAM BOUNCES BACK LIKE A BUNGEE JUMPER! :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:
  6. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 18:22
    [quote="Big Ozzie"]The gallows have been built with American supervision to meet "human rights standards."] I liked that bit Big Oz :lol: If someone is being executed they no longer have any rights, no rights on this earth anyway. I don't get it though, why do they say to be executed within 30 days, is there some sadistic pleasure in seeing him wait for his end :? I would want one hell of a meal to end my life on. I like eggs and chips the best. I would like to smoke a bong before I would go. So is it certain then that saddams neck will break when the lever is pulled, he won't be kicking about or anything? I'm just hopeing that his end will bring to an end a whole lot of trouble that is out in Iraq at the moment, or it could be possible this will make him some sort of hero or martyr and lead to some sort of uprising, I hope not. I can't imagine he'll have much sleep, thinking about the end to come. Is there really any pleasant way of ending someone's life :( He's done some seriously hideous things in his lifetime, to be sure. Prepare to meet the maker saddam and maybe the hell that is coming to you, the hell you gave so many people in your lifetime.
  7. ColziSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 18:24
    I dont care what the law was this guy needed hanging asap like soon as he found him in his hole ! What diference would of made if he was hung day the found him 3o/60 days later! Infact its made the death toll even higher as people are killing because he's on trial.
  8. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 18:38
    Yeau Colzi it may have been better to do it straight away. Looks like Saddam had no real hopeof escaping the noose, I did think though that maybe Bush would have prefered a life sentence, this might have calmed things down a bit, don't know though. Maybe saddams death will make him a hero to some of the twisted minds out there!
  9. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:01
    Sadam will become a Martyr...to keep him in jail for life would only cause his supporters to attempt to free him by kidnapping innocent civilians, bombing government facilities and other acts of terrorism. Now, perhaps there will be a short lived turmoil and the world can rest for a while.
  10. DandruffBGoneSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:05
    "A doctor will check Saddam's health before the execution" LOL
  11. PASalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:10
    http://www.joe-ks.com/archives_jan2004/ChiaThug.jpg
  12. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:20
    "A doctor will check Saddam's health before the execution" LOL Oh yeau! Well most of us have to book an appoinment :lol: What the hell do he need a doctor for before the execution, to check he has'nt got a cold, give him a lemsip maybe an aspirin for his headache or maybe viagra for him to watch his last porno :lol:
  13. petergriffinSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:37
    The gallows have been built with American supervision to meet "human rights standards." BULLSHIT I SAY. not strangle him. awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
  14. jabaSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:39
    I say keep the c unt alive to watch his country 'improve' lol!
  15. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 19:55
    I am not someone who agrees with the death penalty. I don't know if I believe in Karma, I do believe Sadam is a very evil person and the cruelty he inflicted on others is unimaginable. I hope god exists, otherwise we are all doomed! anyway Saddam if Karma is a true thing then you may spend the next 1 trillion years licking the butt of a hogg. I hope your death is quick. I hope at the end of my life I have eggs and chips! :) and heaven has eggs and chips :)
  16. jabaSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:08
    I have a feeling he will be more useful alive - why kill a monster when you can learn from it?
  17. ColziSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:15
    I have a feeling he will be more useful alive - why kill a monster when you can learn from it? In a perfect world yea u have a point, however this monster cannot live on this earth. Thousands of innocent men woman and kids familys and loved ones need thier pain easing.
  18. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:23
    You know the death sentence is in some way an insult. After all, all us die in the end. So does this mean were all under a death sentence? So if someone is put to death are they really paying a penalty. After all, no one can remember if they lived longer before they were supposed to be dead.
  19. QuackersSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:36
    Humans make me sick sometimes.... :(
  20. MonstermashSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:44
    I think we as the human race are the most disgraced creature on this earth. Every other animal creature does what nature intended it to do. Unless we find harmony with nature we are doomed! :cry:
  21. DandruffBGoneSalvaged from archive26 Dec 2006, 20:57
    Humans make me sick sometimes.... :( Me too T.Rex. We are all awful.
  22. crazyjoeSalvaged from archive27 Dec 2006, 02:30
    You know the death sentence is in some way an insult. After all, all us die in the end. So does this mean were all under a death sentence? So if someone is put to death are they really paying a penalty. After all, no one can remember if they lived longer before they were supposed to be dead. Why should he live when he has ordered thousands to die?
  23. BrixtonSalvaged from archive27 Dec 2006, 06:22
    Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed.
  24. lonesome on'ry & meanSalvaged from archive27 Dec 2006, 13:28
    What diference would of made if he was hung day the found him 3o/60 days later! It now has the veneer of legality. In fact its made the death toll even higher as people are killing because he's on trial. Not so, Saddam is yesterday's man. The killing going on is an attempt to gain power in the new Iraq. The 'insurgents' are trying to overthrow the fledgling democracy and impose themselves as the government. The last thing they want is Saddam back. Look at the age of these people, they have grown up under the previous regime. They have learned one lesson, power is gained and maintained through the use of force.
  25. steppman2Salvaged from archive27 Dec 2006, 18:31
    Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed. MWT Good luck trolling yet another thread.
  26. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 04:53
    Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed. MWT Good luck trolling yet another thread. Shadap.
  27. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:01
    Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed. MWT Good luck trolling yet another thread. Shadap. muahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAhahahahahah
  28. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:04
    But dont you slighty agree there Ozzie, with my comment... ''Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed'' The Americans are doing the best they can to fast track his execution so he cant be tried for crimes that were supported with military equipment, intelligence etc etc provided by the americans, as I say, very convenient dont you think?
  29. ChebSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:19
    I think.
  30. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:25
    But dont you slighty agree there Ozzie, with my comment... ''Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed'' The Americans are doing the best they can to fast track his execution so he cant be tried for crimes that were supported with military equipment, intelligence etc etc provided by the americans, as I say, very convenient dont you think? No Brix, I do not feel that it is a matter of convenience. FACT: The United States supplied Saddam with weapons and military equipment during the Iran/Iraq war. This is known by the world. FACT: Saddam more than likely turned and used those weapons on his own people, against Kuwait and against the Coalition forces that are there now and in the last engagement 10 years ago. Why would the United States be responsible for Saddam using weapons against people that they were not intended for? Are you trying to say that the U.S. should not have given the Arms to Iraq? Iran was or Enemy...we chose the lessor of two evils to support. It happens all the time! Should Smith and Wesson be held responsible for making a gun that killed someone? Should Ford be responsible because someone drove their car into a tree? Perhaps farmers and food manufacturers should be punished because some people eat too much and are fat! Saddam needs to be executed because he was found guilty of crimes against his people and sentenced to death by a trial of his peers. Keeping him alive and in prison would only serve as fodder for militant support groups to attempt to free him by any means. That includes increased kidnappings, bombings, insurgencies and acts of terrorism. Executing him will make him a Martyr for a while, then this radical groups will follow a new idiot. We may see an increase in violence for a while after his execution, but that will calm down and the world will be able to go on and heal itself. We must find a suitable leadership for Iraq. One that can control the different factions that live there. One that is fair and does not lead by the sword. This area of the world has only known a leadership that led by violence for hundreds of years, it will take years for peace to reach the region and be accepted.
  31. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:33
    http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_cr/s092002.html '' Having cozied up to Saddam, Washington found it hard to break away--even after going to war with him in 1991. Through years of both tacit and overt support, the West helped create the Saddam of today, giving him time to build deadly arsenals and dominate his people.''
  32. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 05:53
    http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_cr/s092002.html '' Having cozied up to Saddam, Washington found it hard to break away--even after going to war with him in 1991. Through years of both tacit and overt support, the West helped create the Saddam of today, giving him time to build deadly arsenals and dominate his people.'' If you would read my post, I believe that you will see that I agree with this here: FACT: The United States supplied Saddam with weapons and military equipment during the Iran/Iraq war. This is known by the world. FACT: Saddam more than likely turned and used those weapons on his own people, against Kuwait and against the Coalition forces that are there now and in the last engagement 10 years ago. The United States has not hidden the fact that we supplied Saddam these weapons since it was first disclosed years ago. What then is the point of your statement, Brixton? Do you really believe that if Saddam were allowed to live, he would uncover some sinister plot that involved him, others and the United States Government? Dude, Wake Up and Smell the Coffee! There have been "sinister plots" that have been formulated and acted out by all types of governments around the world, INCLUDING YOURS! This is not new news! What things would be disclosed if Saddam were to live? Perhaps Blair and Bush had a Homosexual affair? Did the Queen Mum Pork Saddam's favorite Camel? Please, post your reasons for stating: ''Kill him before he can be put to trial for events that invloved the Americans, very convenient indeed'' The Americans are doing the best they can to fast track his execution so he cant be tried for crimes that were supported with military equipment, intelligence etc etc provided by the americans, as I say, very convenient dont you think?
  33. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 06:03
    ''Do you really believe that if Saddam were allowed to live, he would uncover some sinister plot that involved him, others and the United States Government? '' Thats pretty much it, look at it like this ozzie, why kill him now? He has not been tried for other crimes he commited yet. so why kill him now? surely the best thing to do is to try him for EVERY dam crime this sicko commited then kill him, but they seem to be in an awfull hurry to get him rid. Also mate, why isnt Saddam being tried in the Hague or somewhere like that where all other guys like him have been tried - Milosovic etc? It is illegal I think - to invade a country, get rid of its leader and try him in that country. The court may appear to be Iraqi, but trust me its not. I watched a docu oon it a while back -once the Americans had secured the greenzone they then looked for a sutible place to use a s a court - the whole process of bringing this court into shape - building it etc etc up to standards to try saddam was wholey created by the Americans. Now I dont confess to be a master of knowledge when it comes to laws of war and what the occupying forcescan do and cant but Im opretty sure tyey cant invade a country and then try their drefeated leader in the same country. So why isnt he being tried like I say in the Hague or somewhere like that? Because its convenient for the Americans not to expose some of the aides they gave him to commit certain crimes aginst his own people and others. I am at work at he mo ozzie so dont get a shed load of time to be here, but if I did, I could uncover som,e events in history where the americans collaboratted with saddam. I think it was even saddam himself that was quoted as saying something like 'this trial will reveal things that will be more damaging to the Americans...'' I need to have more time to find this stuff but im sure I could.
  34. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 07:10
    ''Do you really believe that if Saddam were allowed to live, he would uncover some sinister plot that involved him, others and the United States Government? '' Thats pretty much it, look at it like this ozzie, why kill him now? He has not been tried for other crimes he commited yet. so why kill him now? surely the best thing to do is to try him for EVERY dam crime this sicko commited then kill him, but they seem to be in an awfull hurry to get him rid. Why waste time and money when he has already been found guilty and will be executed. Regardless if he was found innocent or guilty of any other crimes that could be prosecuted for, he will die for those crimes which he is already convicted. You can put a man on trial many times for many years, but you can only execute him once. His execution is inevitable...they should get it over with and move on! Also mate, why isnt Saddam being tried in the Hague or somewhere like that where all other guys like him have been tried - Milosovic etc? hmmmmmmm, good question. I feel that it is because his crimes were against the people in his country. Iraq is now attempting to be a Democracy, the trial is part of a free, democratic society...something that Saddam never allowed. For people to defend themselves the way he is allowed to defend himself against the charges. It is illegal I think - to invade a country, get rid of its leader and try him in that country. The court may appear to be Iraqi, but trust me its not. I watched a docu oon it a while back -once the Americans had secured the greenzone they then looked for a sutible place to use a s a court - the whole process of bringing this court into shape - building it etc etc up to standards to try saddam was wholey created by the Americans. Now I dont confess to be a master of knowledge when it comes to laws of war and what the occupying forcescan do and cant but Im opretty sure tyey cant invade a country and then try their drefeated leader in the same country. I do not know where you get your information, I remind you of some of the most famous trials for crimes of Government and/or Military personnel for crimes against Humanity that took place at Nuremberg, Germany 1945-49. Napoleon was tried by the French, England tried its own leaders and those who committed crimes against their country. The list goes on. The moving of trials to a Neutral Jurisdiction is a fairly recent and rare phenomenon. Usually because of multiple jurisdictions and prosecutions that may be involved. Also, the idea of security is foremost as in the case of the Libyan terrorist bombers of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie and subsequent trial at Camp Zeist in The Netherlands. So why isnt he being tried like I say in the Hague or somewhere like that? My guess would be to prove to the Iraqi people that a legitimate trial can be had and how it works. This is all new for these people and many do not believe what they do not see. That is why the Coalition posted the photos of the bodies of Saddam's sons. So people would believe what they are told. Because its convenient for the Americans not to expose some of the aides they gave him to commit certain crimes aginst his own people and others. I have no doubt that some of the aide given to Iraq over the years was used for means other than what it was intended for. The United States was involved in an "arms for hostages" deal which became known as "Iran-Contra"....there is no doubt that Iran has and would use the same arms against us or our allies should they feel a need. I am at work at he mo ozzie so dont get a shed load of time to be here, but if I did, I could uncover som,e events in history where the americans collaboratted with saddam. I think it was even saddam himself that was quoted as saying something like 'this trial will reveal things that will be more damaging to the Americans...'' I need to have more time to find this stuff but im sure I could. K....see ya!
  35. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 07:55
    Why waste time and money when he has already been found guilty and will be executed. For the families and friends of the victims of these other crimes would like to see justice for his evil. For example, in America, you guys still use the death penalty in certain states, so say for example a man killed five other men like a serial killer - they put up five seperate trials each for the different murders, he's found guilty on his first trial and condemmed to death and is so killed without going to trial for the other four murders - How would the families of the four dead men feel that he was not tried and found guilty for their murder? Much like Saddam, there are plenty of other charges that he should face before being hung to bring closure and peace of mind to the families of the victims - in their view he gets off lightly by being killed as he's not been found guilty in the court for crimes that effected them. Iraq is now attempting to be a Democracy, the trial is part of a free, democratic society...something that Saddam never allowed. For people to defend themselves the way he is allowed to defend himself against the charges Wise words, that I totally agree with. My guess would be to prove to the Iraqi people that a legitimate trial can be had and how it works. If that were true then yes it would be the right idea but to be fare from what Ive read about the trial in iraq as I kind of mentioned earlier - its not exactly fully Iraqi - i.e the influence from American interests is large. From building the court to owning all the access to the media coverage in the court conveninetly being able to edit stuff out and in as they chose and as suits them etc etc. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/04/farce-of-law-tr…
  36. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 09:35
    Okay....we are almost in agreement and have worked this out. One thing you wrote : For the families and friends of the victims of these other crimes would like to see justice for his evil. For example, in America, you guys still use the death penalty in certain states, so say for example a man killed five other men like a serial killer - they put up five seperate trials each for the different murders, he's found guilty on his first trial and condemmed to death and is so killed without going to trial for the other four murders - How would the families of the four dead men feel that he was not tried and found guilty for their murder? Much like Saddam, there are plenty of other charges that he should face before being hung to bring closure and peace of mind to the families of the victims - in their view he gets off lightly by being killed as he's not been found guilty in the court for crimes that effected them. Here you are mistaken. The most recent case that comes to mind is "The D.C. Snipers" In October '02 two men drove around Washington DC, Virginia and Maryland with one man hidden in the trunk of the car. There was a small hole behind the license plate that they would shoot a high powered rifle out of. These men were tried and convicted to death in one state and never brought to trial in the other. Beltway sniper attacks From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Beltway sniper attacks took place during three weeks of October 2002 in the Mid-Atlantic United States. Ten people were killed and three others critically injured by spree killers in and around Washington, D.C., in various locations throughout the Baltimore-Washington Metropolitan Area and along Interstate 95 in Virginia. It was later learned that the rampage apparently began the month before with murders and robbery in Louisiana, Alabama, and Georgia which had resulted in 3 deaths. An earlier spree by the pair had killed victims in California, Arizona, and Texas, for a total of 16 deaths so far. The shootings finally ended on October 24, when police arrested John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo at a highway rest area off of Interstate 70 near Myersville, Maryland, after receiving two telephone tips from a trucker and another alert motorist. It was later learned that the three-week-long rampage was motivated, at least in part, by a plot to extort $10 million from the U.S. government. Charges in Virginia against the pair were tried first. In 2004, Muhammad was sentenced to death and Malvo to several sentences of life imprisonment without parole in Virginia for several of the attacks. Many more criminal charges are pending against each man, although a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Roper v. Simmons in March 2005 effectively precludes a death penalty for Malvo. Muhammad's death penalty was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court on April 22, 2005. While Muhammad was awaiting execution in Virginia, in the fall of 2005, he and Malvo were extradited to Montgomery County, Maryland where the most incidents took place to face trial, after which, they will be returned to Virginia under an agreement between the two states. Civil legal action also resulted. Neither shooter was legally allowed to acquire firearms in the U.S. The dealer responsible for the rifle used in the attacks had an extensive record of firearms violations, and had not reported the gun missing (after it had apparently been shoplifted by Malvo) as required by law. A civil lawsuit alleging negligence against both the gun dealer and the manufacturer who made and distributed the weapon resulted in a US$2.5 million out-of-court settlement for survivors and families of victims The rest of the states where the murders occurred have declined to prosecute.
  37. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 09:48
    Yeah, I remember that in the news - it was covered as a big story over here. I feel sorry for the families of those that were killed and never did see the charges, like Saddam, he'll be hung within a mnth but it will leave a lot of people without any clousre on the deaths of their loved ones. I say, dont hang him yet, try him for all the crimes he commited then kill him. Then there will be closure on all his crimes, and (the part we disagree on) America's role in some of them will be brought to light.
  38. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 09:57
    Well, like the families of the DC Sniper Victims....and the Families of those who know Saddam is the one who is responsible, just seeing that the man will be executed is usually closure. The only thing that they want is for him to pay for his crime...they often would be willing to kill him without trial, so as long as he is executed, is not justice served? Why do people have to go through the ordeal of another trial if the outcome is the same? I just do not agree with the method....to Humane! I feel they should use the traditional Arabic way, the same as the terrorist have done to their hostages and prisoners....BEHEADING! Cut his head off and then lift his severed head so that he can see his own headless body!
  39. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 10:04
    I suppose, his death will bring closure to those effected by other crimes, at the end of the day thats what they are calling for and i suppose they know he's guilty as hell anyways. And yeah, they should either cut off his bearded noggin or gas him like he did the kurds, maybe torture him for a while - yeah thats it - torture him for a year like he had folk tortured - let him feel the pain. I always thought Saddam was a pussy when they found him hiding in his hole, if he was meant to be the leader of his army - he should have died in combat - instead he opted to hide like a fucking scared little boy..says a lot about the man himself. http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/u/U/saddam_hang.gif
  40. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 10:08
    http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/u/U/saddam_hang.gif LMFAO^^^^ That's the best! I love his buggy eyes and kickin' feet friggin Bastard!
  41. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 10:14
    http://members.shaw.ca/samasutra/images/saddam.gif http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/chirac_saddam.gif http://www.flexi.net.au/~dmulliss/saddam/cutout1.jpg
  42. ColziSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 10:32
    Was that really in the Sun ^^ ! dont suprise me if it is mind! ----------------- http://www.cloudane.com/stuff/new_straregy.gif http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/6817/gallowshumourir2.jpg http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/294/lovewn2.gif http://www.cloudane.com/stuff/bigboy2.gif MY FAVE- http://www.cloudane.com/stuff/beta232.gif I say we make a pact - on the day of Saddams hanging we all have a Saddam pic! ^^ :lol:
  43. BrixtonSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 10:50
    http://www.cloudane.com/stuff/beta232.gif I say we make a pact - on the day of Saddams hanging we all have a Saddam pic! ^^ :lol: Im with ya on that one and that gif above is superb!! http://www.turkeytravelplanner.com/AssetsTurkey/People/Sa…
  44. steppman2Salvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 11:04
    http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/u/U/saddam_hang.gif He is to be hung in an orange jumpsuit, like any other murderer. ;)
  45. extentofmysinSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 19:21
    the worst thing they can do is kill him rather than send to jail- by hanging him will truly make him a martyr/god like figure and you can expect even more terrorism against the west/usa as a result from wannabe saddam-ites with too much time on their hands
  46. ColziSalvaged from archive28 Dec 2006, 19:36
    the worst thing they can do is kill him rather than send to jail- by hanging him will truly make him a martyr/god like figure and you can expect even more terrorism against the west/usa as a result from wannabe saddam-ites with too much time on their hands They should of killed him when they found him in his hole. www.dsupport.com/WE_GOT_HIM.htm
  47. MonstermashSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 01:47
    Saddam would have been better off putting up a fight and being killed that way, far more honourable, but he's not honourable is he?
  48. Big OzzieSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 04:14
    Saddam is a PUNK....a PUSSY....he controlled his people with FEAR, not Leadership! Like many punks and street hoods, he is only as strong as the gang that he hides behind. Destroy the Gang and you destroy the Piece of Shit that leads it!
  49. lonesome on'ry & meanSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 12:11
    They should of killed him when they found him in his hole. But that would have been murder. If the Iraqi people are trying to build themselves a new country from the ground up, the last thing they do is start off with a murder. Even of someone as reprehensible as Saddam. Just because Saddam never hesitated to murder anyone, is no reason to copy him. Quite the opposite in fact, By putting him on a very public trial before executing him the new Iraqi government are showing their own citizens how different they are from the previous regime.
  50. DandruffBGoneSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 12:12
    They should of killed him when they found him in his hole. But that would have been murder. If the Iraqi people are trying to build themselves a new country from the ground up, the last thing they do is start off with a murder. Even of someone as reprehensible as Saddam. Just because Saddam never hesitated to murder anyone, is no reason to copy him. Quite the opposite in fact, By putting him on a very public trial before executing him the new Iraqi government are showing their own citizens how different they are from the previous regime. I agree with you.....and a televised execution is stooping to the level of the previous regime.
  51. DandruffBGoneSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 21:16
    Saddam dies tonight.
  52. petergriffinSalvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 21:57
    the cunt is dead now, HORRAY!!!!
  53. steppman2Salvaged from archive29 Dec 2006, 22:30
    the #!&* is dead now, HORRAY!!!! Yay!

Reply

Sign in or create an account to reply to this old topic.

Want your old post taken down? Get in touch.